Last seen: July 30, 2026 11:09 am
It has been adorable to see you try. Oh, how you have shifted around. It has been amazing. Did you find a better landmark with evidence of excavati…
Sorry but your proposed plaintext does not contain any reference to inches. I suppose you did not read the explicit instructions correctly. IN THRE…
I will be the guy that pushed through all of the BS and got this one past the finish line. I’d rate the difficulty at 11 out of 10, and for surprisin…
I won’t be giving up on this one. Not going to let it stay buried. The method is in alignment with the instructions.
Oliv92 gave up on this cipher because people didn’t engage with them, so they lost faith in the methodology, which was the Zodiac’s method. That is p…
And so the dormant forums became another bump in the road on the daily journey. But the debunks were so bad here that I actually found them entertain…
Then I quickly realized this place is a ghost town. Looks like people lost interested in Zodiac ciphers since Z32 is “impossible”.
That is the true accounting of history, to the best of my knowledge. I was not aware of the extra layers involved until I was banned (without good re…
And it is the exact situation I have faced with Z32 as well. History repeating itself, but I have the critical final step and I found the landmark. …
I have no doubt that had people talked to them more, it would have unraveled awhile ago. But they didn’t, so I had to come around in 2026 with the pr…
I still sympathize with Oliv92 because they properly modeled this problem but were still missing the critical final step that is non-negotiable to arr…
Also not my fault Oliv92 came so close, didn’t receive engagement from experts, didn’t have a ranking step, and picked the wrong “favorite” from their…
The dissenters have been anonymous forum users such as “shaqmeister”, or “DMW” (who pointed at the wrong place, lol). But it is David Stampher which…
There are some invested in it being wrong for various reasons, however the landmark should still be scanned regardless, to be sure. It is why I will …