Last seen: April 19, 2026 9:01 pm
So while the experts haven’t engaged with the work, I have seen 2 other people that I am virtually certain have been inspired by my work, but have not…
And why am I protecting my work now? Well, I have been keeping an eye on things. Suddenly people are very interested in Python based constraint sol…
At this point it about protecting my work, which is easy to do as I own the domain for the plaintext, and I have a DOI for my paper. The methodology …
They can talk about natural origin, watering holes, whatever. I found the landmark, own the domain, have my work timestamped going back to December, …
Another day, another bump. But at least this time I can say that I launched the initial placeholder site for inthreeandthreeeighthsradiansten.com …
I do feel good knowing there is a way to actually determine truth here in the real world. Otherwise I wouldn’t have much to go on. But there is a wa…
Their little diagram that “proves” natural origin on the landmark didn’t account for the inner circle, either way, it was bogus. It looked nice thoug…
Bumping my great thread to bury the detractors attempts to misdirect with their recently posted counter-thread. I will not be entering their competin…
It’s all part of the fascinating story of the Mount Diablo code.
So the lack of engagement here from experts is one for the history books.
The way I know the Zodiac created the landmark is that the first triangle in the ciphertext matches the landmark when overlaid. That is called a sign…
Anyways once they scan the landmark I found, all will be revealed. I already revealed it awhile ago, though. At least the surface level part of it.
I don’t really care if their minds reject it, as I know it to be mathematically true in objective reality, which is good enough for me. I just added …
I was wondering what the resistance was all about, but I think it has to do with the crime scene geometry. I think people want to discredit the work…
If any expert ranchers are viewing this thread, have you seen a watering hole of this morphology before? Is this standard practice?