I don’t know how he can truly be viable when nobody has any photo or physical description of Ross Sullivan in the years Zodiac was active. Morbid obes…
Again, you’re conveniently allowing for someone to look like a sketch drawn in 1969 based on a photo from (I believe) 1959. That’s the date I found on…
Morf, I am not nitpicking when I say that the photos of Ross are not contemporaneous with the sketches. That’s as much a fact as anything else here, i…
So in a thread called "Ross Sullivan Dissenters," I’m not allowed to say why I don’t think there’s enough evidence to consider Ross a viable…
Here’s why I don’t buy Ross: 1) Lots of guys looked like that in the 1960s. There’s nothing unique about the older photo of Sullivan or the sketch of…
Devil’s advocate: Why should we put much stock in Tim Sullivan’s suspicions about his brother if we don’t buy Steve Hodel’s, Dennis Kaufman’s, or Gary…
There are a few reasons to not get terribly excited about this. 1) The photo of Ross is not contemporaneous with the sketches. Anyone comparing them …
No comment on the hoax angle, but I would like to add something to the Berryessa discussion. To me, the costume was just a natural extension of the…