Zodiac Discussion Forum

TomVoigt
@tomvoigt
Noble Member
Joined: February 8, 2018 5:23 am
Last seen: April 19, 2023 5:00 pm
Topics: 9 / Replies: 1332
Reply
Re: We really should be looking at RHs, right?

It is a shame that you think I am a troll for disagreeing with you. That’s not why I think you’re a troll.

5 years ago
Reply
Re: Hello

Please do come visit me, you even have the element of surprise since you know what I look like and you’re just a terrified, anonymous troll. I look f…

5 years ago
Reply
Re: We really should be looking at RHs, right?

As I am sure you were told before, because one of our guys claims to have told you, the methods used by Morrill are not accepted today. Therefore, his…

5 years ago
Reply
Re: We really should be looking at RHs, right?

You do not need to take our guys at their word. Good, because I don’t. In fact, I think you’re a troll. Presenting outdated "evidence" is…

5 years ago
Reply
Re: We really should be looking at RHs, right?

There is no evidence linking Bates to Zodiac. Feel free to post your evidence so we can debate it.

5 years ago
Reply
Re: Was somebody filming the zodiac

Remember that Zodiac most likely stopped at the Rayfield’s car first (about 8/10’s of a mile north) before stopping at Bryan Hartnell’s car and happen…

5 years ago
Reply
Re: We really should be looking at RHs, right?

Here’s some more nonsense… Second, there is no evidence linking the desk top poem to the Zodiac. Third, there is no evidence linking the desk top …

5 years ago
Reply
Re: We really should be looking at RHs, right?

First, there is no evidence linking Bates to the Zodiac. Well that’s some nonsense.

5 years ago
Reply
Re: The Costume

Well considering it was Pacific Heights That is an entirely different neighborhood in San Francisco. The Zodiac events happened in Presidio Heights.

5 years ago
Reply
Re: The Costume

Nobody described a limp or impaired walking until elderly Fouke said "semi limp." Why do the limp advocates — who are more and more like a…

5 years ago
Reply
Re: Joyce Walker – Manhattan Beach, CA 1964

All of this because of of what elderly Fouke said. Amazing.

5 years ago
Reply
Re: Joyce Walker – Manhattan Beach, CA 1964

Also, the doctors son at LB described the man he saw as clumsy or not smooth or something along those lines. No.

5 years ago
Reply
Re: Joyce Walker – Manhattan Beach, CA 1964

Also, the doctors son at LB described the man he saw as clumsy or not smooth or something along those lines. *

5 years ago
Reply
Re: Joyce Walker – Manhattan Beach, CA 1964

So you’re using one of the sunbathers who the odds favor didn’t even see the real Zodiac, and who never mentioned such a detail to the police, but dec…

5 years ago
Reply
Re: Joyce Walker – Manhattan Beach, CA 1964

While Foulke may have initially described the suspect as 150 to 160… He didn’t, though.

5 years ago
Page 32 / 91