And Page 6 says last correspondence received received from Z was March 22 1971.
viewtopic.php?f=103&t=197
Thanks
Not sure if I am posting this pic properly but its from the FBI report.
SAC Sacremento Feb 21,1974
"Comparable areas of unidentified latent prints previously reported on items from different crime scenes, as well as latent prints on different envelops and letters, were compared with each other, but no identification effected."
Not sure who you interpret it, but it sort of sounds like none of the prints match each other….
Z is the master of distraction.
Thank you for sharing Paradox. 
“…they may be dealing with one or more ersatz Zodiacs–other psychotics eager to get into the act, or perhaps even other murderers eager to lay their crimes at the real Zodiac’s doorstep.“ L.A. Times, 1969
Not sure if I am posting this pic properly but its from the FBI report.
SAC Sacremento Feb 21,1974
"Comparable areas of unidentified latent prints previously reported on items from different crime scenes, as well as latent prints on different envelops and letters, were compared with each other, but no identification effected."
Not sure who you interpret it, but it sort of sounds like none of the prints match each other….
Is there conclusive evidence that Zodiac did not wear gloves? There is definitely suggestions. The blooded taxi prints likely to be from the killer, the expanded testimony from the Robbins kids where they describe him setting Stine upright, Zodiac’s dubious claim about using airplane glue on his fingertips, palm prints on letters… Those are all good reasons but perhaps not conclusive. I wonder how certain they were that the Napa car door prints were donated by the message writer.
