http://www.timesheraldonline.com/articl … /170619901
I respect Michael butterfield’s view that the zodiac was one man. But I could be wrong. If their was two people who were the zodiac, wouldn’t one of them confess, or talk? This author apparently thinks that their may have been more than one person who commited the zodiac crimes and they were from Vallejo. I don’t know if I agree. I sort of don’t.
We have a thread for this novel and the article from the VTH.
I will leave this up for a little bit so you can see my post and then I will merge your post to the existing thread.
Three people can keep a secret if two of them are dead.
Don’t you love the way mainstream media (and writers like her) just throw out these ideas like they’re both new and obvious?
Why wasn’t Zodiac caught? There must have been a team Zodiac, stupid! Simple!
I think he lived in Vallejo. Why? Because that’s where he started, stupid! What about the possibilities of Riverside, Lompoc…. oh never mind.
All I know is, if I wanted to write an original crime story and base it on a true crime it wouldn’t take much research to see which infamous serial killer (aside from JTR) has been done to death already. Probably shows how much research she’s actually done.
Check out my website: www.darkideas.net
