Yeah, he was slinging insults. Calling someone "internet garbage" is not an insult?

Ok, so we ignore what "Wonky" said to instigate it?

You’re a funny fudge.

And someone of your age can’t ignore it?

Everyone needs to relax.

And someone of your age can’t ignore it?

You should have so much else to do.

Reddit’s new mascot.

And someone of your age can’t ignore it?

You should have so much else to do.

Reddit’s new mascot.

Actually, no dead bodies that need picking up at the moment so work is quite boring tonight.

However, even if he is not dead, your handling of the evidence does not scuttle the entire investigation/prosecution.

The chain of custody and handling of these letters have been legendarily bad ever since they were received by the various police departments. Back in the 1960’s evidence was not handled properly as it is now. Back then, criminals rarely got off on technicalities due to evidence mishandling.

I have heard and read some letters were lost for awhile because they were stored in a police officer’s garage. Not just from Dennis Kaufman who might be thought of as a unreliable source.

I found out later that the SFPD had lost all the original Zodiac letters. Three of them were found in the garage of one of the investigators who worked on the case (I won’t mention his name). Once evidence leaves the evidence room, it is no longer admissable in court. http://thezodiackiller.digitalzones.com/

I have also heard some letters were taken to parties as conversation pieces.

Good observation, Shawn. I had momentarily forgotten about that because I was being attacked by Tom for being on Tom’s side.

The evidence in the possession of law enforcement could have been used conclusively to prosecute, convict, and sentence someone. Today it can no longer serve that purpose. But it DOES serve the purpose of supplying probable cause to arrest someone and gather further evidence which WILL convict. Maybe I was too tired from a long day’s work to make that point last night as lucidly as I did just now.

Morf’s statement is slightly confusing.

"My Zodiac Police source, "Pump the brakes on the Zodiac DNA rumors" that there are no new developments".

Does that mean Morf was instructed by LE to get rid of the DNA rumors?

Or is the ‘pump the brakes’ Morf’s own assessment?

And the ‘that there are no new developments’ part – is that Morf’s own statement, or did that specific statement come from LE?

So now the way this reads to me is to stop saying there are no new developments because there are?

So now the way this reads to me is to stop saying there are no new developments because there are?

Good observation, Shawn. I had momentarily forgotten about that because I was being attacked by Tom for being on Tom’s side.

Who are you? Name and alleged law firm.

So now the way this reads to me is to stop saying there are no new developments because there are?

I’m inclined to agree with that interpretation — unless Morf weighs in otherwise.

I even met you at the SF task force meeting at the Roxie

I have the whole thing on video, it’s on YouTube, and I don’t recall interacting with a crybaby. Nice attempt at trolling, better luck next time.

I even met you at the SF task force meeting at the Roxie

I have the whole thing on video, it’s on YouTube, and I don’t recall interacting with a crybaby. Nice attempt at trolling, better luck next time.

Pot….. kettle….. all that good stuff.

When the actual Zodiac is identified and Voigt realizes he has nothing to do with Gaikowski, we’re all gonna have a ball! ^^

When the actual Zodiac is identified and Voigt realizes he has nothing to do with Gaikowski, we’re all gonna have a ball! ^^

I’d hope we’d actually be interested in his identification and hopefully prosecution, not whether he turns out to be anyone’s suspect.