But…how good was the photograph? Have we seen it anywhere?
Could be the actual prints were not good, but it was not realized when the photo was taken. If the photo was no good when later developed….??
No, haven’t seen it, don’t think it’s in the public domain.
The report says it’s useable though, as I said, so it was good when developed, you’d think. *shrug*
Don’t know about you, but I think it’s hokum anyway. Stab a couple, ride off, then be stupid enough to leave your fingerprints on a phone booth? Doesn’t seem all that likely. Especially if "you" know the police found the first phone booth "you" used pretty quickly….. Naaaaaa, stoopid.
I agree smithy…I have never felt any prints on the phone were from Bryan and Cecelia’s attacker and I very much don’t think it was still wet with his hand sweat. lol
“…they may be dealing with one or more ersatz Zodiacs–other psychotics eager to get into the act, or perhaps even other murderers eager to lay their crimes at the real Zodiac’s doorstep.“ L.A. Times, 1969
T., hee hee, I hadn’t thought of that aspect, that it was sweat that made the handset so damp.
"Here kid, give me a hand with this phone! I can’t hold onto it! It’s jumping like a fish, I tells ya!" 
