He did post the news first though without verifying if the interview was legit. I think the proper diligence would have been to verify its authenticity before you posted the news of it.

Destry and I worked together to catch an imposter. And it worked.

But don’t let that stop you from bringing up my news from last March, I appreciate you reminding everyone about my DNA scoop.

PS:
They got DNA.

Congrats. On catching the imposter. Maybe next time though you should verify such news before you start posting it around everywhere.

Don’t think that’s too much to ask.

Pretty convenient how we have still heard NOTHING about any such DNA discovery. It’s almost as if they never got any to begin with.

I guess in 2020 we will still be waiting…for confirmation.

I guess in 2020 we will still be waiting…for confirmation.

Holy cow, are you an entitled little baby or what?

Do you see me whining?

To be honest I have had very reserved opinions regarding Tom Voight in the past, as everywhere I see him mentioned and proverbial sh!tstorm seems to eventuate. However if in this case Tom has taken a part in ‘Outing’ an imposter that would have actually been a plus for his POI, I commend him on his actions that speak much louder than any words!

PS:
They got DNA.

In regards to the DNA – My 2c is that yes they have a working sample but are still trying to find a match (without alerting Zodiac should he still be alive). Now if they would only compare the DNA to every suspect on this forum we could get rid of alot of unnecessary baggage and BS!

To be honest I have had very reserved opinions regarding Tom Voight in the past, as everywhere I see him mentioned and proverbial sh!tstorm seems to eventuate. However if in this case Tom has taken a part in ‘Outing’ an imposter that would have actually been a plus for his POI, I commend him on his actions that speak much louder than any words!

I’ve had to rid my discussion forum of many a bonehead over the last 20 years, and some just can’t let it go.

Well we probably will all have to eat some crow if z is ever caught…prolly end up a guy with some foreign ethnicity with none of the sketches even being close…with the last 10 + years involving widely and easily spread my daddy did it type books, etc is any body really surprised by this…

I’ll say this for Tom, he told the truth about what happened. If Tom was a charlatan he would have tried to insist this was actually Hartnell since it greatly favored Tom’s top suspect Gaikowski.

I’ll say this for Tom, he told the truth about what happened. If Tom was a charlatan he would have tried to insist this was actually Hartnell since it greatly favored Tom’s top suspect Gaikowski.

Thank you.

I’ll say this for Tom, he told the truth about what happened. If Tom was a charlatan he would have tried to insist this was actually Hartnell since it greatly favored Tom’s top suspect Gaikowski.

Agreed.

Separately the alleged email quote makes it clear it wasn’t Hartnell.

the alleged email quote makes it clear it wasn’t Hartnell.

Or poorly transcribed.

the alleged email quote makes it clear it wasn’t Hartnell.

Or poorly transcribed.

That’s a good point as well. Though you’d assume the interviewer could have simply cut and pasted the email response.

Destry isn’t looking for anything to be deleted, no worries.

Thoughts and prayers to Tom Voigt and friends after yet another embarrassing incident.

Been a tough year and a bit with the DNA stuff and now this. Take care.

To be clear…this has nothing to do with Tom Voigt. In anything, he’s the one that did his due diligence and confirmed all of this as fake.

That’s not exactly true. This is what Voigt said on April 10, 2019, long before he let Hines post the so-called Breaking News on his website:
"The Hines nonsense is a bunch of "you’ll have to trust me on this" junk, first from just Harvey, but now also from Destry and the other two who have copies of the full junk report they refuse to share.." viewtopic.php?f=95&t=4326

In other words, Voigt let someone he had previously declared untrustworthy post a false claim on his website and promoted that claim. Then he took credit for exposing the claim as fake. Giving him credit for "due diligence" is unwarranted.

In other words, Voigt let someone he had previously declared untrustworthy post a false claim on his website and promoted that claim. Then he took credit for exposing the claim as fake. Giving him credit for "due diligence" is unwarranted.

I never said Destry was untrustworthy. Can someone please put this obvious troll in place? Mods? Not sharing the report is what I clearly had an issue with.

I have said from the beginning that Destry and I worked together to catch the fake Bryan. Try and keep up.

Also…you’re still on the fake Bryan stuff? The rest of the world has moved on.

In other words, Voigt let someone he had previously declared untrustworthy post a false claim on his website and promoted that claim. Then he took credit for exposing the claim as fake. Giving him credit for "due diligence" is unwarranted.

I never said Destry was untrustworthy. Can someone please put this obvious troll in place? Mods? Not sharing the report is what I clearly had an issue with.

I have said from the beginning that Destry and I worked together to catch the fake Bryan. Try and keep up.

Also…you’re still on the fake Bryan stuff? The rest of the world has moved on.

This is what Voigt said on April 10, 2019, long before he let Hines post the so-called Breaking News on his website:
"The Hines nonsense is a bunch of "you’ll have to trust me on this" junk, first from just Harvey, but now also from Destry and the other two who have copies of the full junk report they refuse to share.." viewtopic.php?f=95&t=4326

You categorized Destry Hines as someone who promoted "nonsense" and "junk." They’re your words.

This is what Voigt said on April 10, 2019, long before he let Hines post the so-called Breaking News on his website:
"The Hines nonsense is a bunch of "you’ll have to trust me on this" junk, first from just Harvey, but now also from Destry and the other two who have copies of the full junk report they refuse to share.." viewtopic.php?f=95&t=4326

You categorized Destry Hines as someone who promoted "nonsense" and "junk." They’re your words.

Your troll interpretation of reality won’t change reality. I never claimed Destry was untrustworthy. You’re simply a liar. My issue was not being able to read the report for myself. It had nothing to do with not trusting the source.

If you lie about me again, Zarbin, your account at my site is terminated. And since you obviously won’t be lasting much longer here, it’s back to Reddit for you…except I’m sure you’re already shadowbanned.

This is what Voigt said on April 10, 2019, long before he let Hines post the so-called Breaking News on his website:
"The Hines nonsense is a bunch of "you’ll have to trust me on this" junk, first from just Harvey, but now also from Destry and the other two who have copies of the full junk report they refuse to share.." viewtopic.php?f=95&t=4326

You categorized Destry Hines as someone who promoted "nonsense" and "junk." They’re your words.

Your troll interpretation of reality won’t change reality. I never claimed Destry was untrustworthy. You’re simply a liar. My issue was not being able to read the report for myself. It had nothing to do with not trusting the source.

If you lie about me again, Zarbin, you’re account is terminated. And since you obviously won’t be lasting much longer here, it’s back to Reddit for you…except I’m sure you’re already shadowbanned.

You’re threatening someone on someone else’s website? That might qualify as a delusion of grandeur.

Your history and your words speak for themselves. If you don’t want people reminded of them, perhaps you shouldn’t do and say them in the first place. Again, this is what you said on April 10, 2019, "The Hines nonsense is a bunch of "you’ll have to trust me on this" junk, first from just Harvey, but now also from Destry and the other two who have copies of the full junk report they refuse to share.." viewtopic.php?f=95&t=4326