Zodiac Discussion Forum

The phone booth at …
 
Notifications
Clear all

The phone booth at Main and Clinton

41 Posts
15 Users
0 Reactions
4,565 Views
(@sandiland)
Posts: 90
Estimable Member
 

Ok thank you Tom V. Was looking at some photos of him. He had some hair then, but following year he never had much.

 
Posted : January 11, 2021 3:42 pm
(@dont_lick_it)
Posts: 25
Eminent Member
 

There is no way that zodiac would have left any prints there. Why would he? He wore gloves at LB .Taking them off to call?lol

 
Posted : January 11, 2021 5:45 pm
 egg
(@egg)
Posts: 144
Estimable Member
 

There is no way that zodiac would have left any prints there. Why would he? He wore gloves at LB .Taking them off to call?lol

Where does it say he used gloves?

 
Posted : January 11, 2021 7:18 pm
(@tomvoigt)
Posts: 1352
Noble Member
 

There is no way that zodiac would have left any prints there. Why would he?

Yeah! And there’s no way he would have left witnesses, surviving victims, tire tracks, footprints, writer’s palmprints, shell casings…

But he did.

 
Posted : January 11, 2021 10:52 pm
(@dont_lick_it)
Posts: 25
Eminent Member
 

There is no way that zodiac would have left any prints there. Why would he? He wore gloves at LB .Taking them off to call?lol

Where does it say he used gloves?

My fault. I was sure he had gloves on. I checked the sketch and yes , he was not wearing gloves. but it had stuck in my memory that he was. After few hours Irealized that Fincher put gloves in the movie. Sorry. Why did he do that?
So why he didnt leave any prints on the rope?

 
Posted : January 12, 2021 5:05 pm
 Ted
(@ted)
Posts: 19
Eminent Member
 

I know I should really check this myself, but were ant prints found on the phone? If not, then whoever phoned from that phone booth was either wearing gloves, or wiped the phone. I’m aware I’m stating the "bleedin obvious" here.

 
Posted : January 12, 2021 5:52 pm
(@dont_lick_it)
Posts: 25
Eminent Member
 

I know I should really check this myself, but were ant prints found on the phone? If not, then whoever phoned from that phone booth was either wearing gloves, or wiped the phone. I’m aware I’m stating the "bleedin obvious" here.

A still-wet palm print was lifted from the telephone receiver.

 
Posted : January 12, 2021 6:03 pm
 Ted
(@ted)
Posts: 19
Eminent Member
 

I know I should really check this myself, but were ant prints found on the phone? If not, then whoever phoned from that phone booth was either wearing gloves, or wiped the phone. I’m aware I’m stating the "bleedin obvious" here.

A still-wet palm print was lifted from the telephone receiver.

Thanks for that, saved me a search. That’s a strange one, a palm print and yet no finger prints. I can’t envisage a scenario where someone using that phone would only leave a palm print. Could be a partial successful attempt to wipe the receiver clean of prints.

 
Posted : January 12, 2021 7:45 pm
(@pathfinder)
Posts: 49
Trusted Member
 

I have left no fingerprints behind me contrary to what the police say in my killings I wear transparent finger tip guards. All it is is 2 coats of airplane cement coated on my finger tips—quite unnoticible & very efective. 9 November 1969

 
Posted : January 13, 2021 2:20 am
(@dont_lick_it)
Posts: 25
Eminent Member
 

I have left no fingerprints behind me contrary to what the police say in my killings I wear transparent finger tip guards. All it is is 2 coats of airplane cement coated on my finger tips—quite unnoticible & very efective. 9 November 1969

Yes and still he left bloody fingerprints on the taxicab.

 
Posted : January 13, 2021 2:32 am
(@themikado90)
Posts: 84
Trusted Member
 

They don’t know for a fact if those are Z’s

 
Posted : January 13, 2021 1:03 pm
Page 3 / 3
Share: