1961, cracking of the genetic code:
http://www.genomenewsnetwork.org/resour … enberg.php
I would like to make the suggestion that the 340 cipher is some what like the Phylogenetic code of the era.
Every three (or four) symbols in order represents one code that produces 1 letter.
I have made some strides in this direction and have found many positive results (all the things you cryptologists love) But my lack of computing power (ability) greatly limits myself to "play the odds".
My view on this came after reading into a strong POI’s private documents that i am not at liberty to share. I have been hesitant to give up this information as naturally there’s a selfish aspect in wanting to solely solve the unsolveable. It is my hope that if someone else can solve the 340 with this info that it will rightfully highlight this POI.
The code:
From what i can conjure each symbol is either A,B,C or D ( E, F etc creates too many codes which would require a computer (or a lot of paper to create a directory) then in 1960’s and even now but the possibility remains.
(this is why i emphasis that pen and paper made the cipher and it’s how it will be solved)
And so:
AAA = A
AAB = B
AAC= C
AAD = D
ABA = E
ABB = F
Etc Etc until Z where it reverts back to A
Symbols:
I have a semi-complete list of which letter (possible letter(s)) for which symbol. (I doubt it would be valuable to anyone if a computer can run the many possibilities)
I have used it on the Z32 and have a solution to it but due to its size it will be easy to dispute my solution (it would require explaining the background logic on how I allocated which letter to which symbol, The logic would need to be understood for it to be accepted but even then due to its size it could write almost anything with this method 
Have fun cryptologist, I assure you with a sharp eye you will spot some amazing things very early 
Yes, dyslexia is probably my first undiagnosed language.
I’m happy To post my ABCD’s
I haven’t deciphered anything substantial on the 340 i’ve merely narrowed which symbol equates to which letter.
There is possibly a issue of symbol values transponding in relation to its position with in each code, Not all symbols seem to be affected only ones that look mirrored e.g. half circle bottom / top.
Yes, dyslexia is probably my first undiagnosed language.
It’s just a coincidence it looks this way.
but the ABCD could also follow the formula above (with 3 letters not 4) and the alphabet replacing amino acids on the outside circumference.
This is the "genetic code" of the era and before anyone too clever says or asks… No the Zodiacs DNA is not in the cipher, i’m not insinuating that.
Yes, dyslexia is probably my first undiagnosed language.
deleted.
Yes, dyslexia is probably my first undiagnosed language.
The greatest thing i’ve found with this is if you run the statistics of the average use of each letter in a given sequential order you easily discover your bearings.
And with those initial bearings using the codes directory above you find many solutions that offer a variety of plauseable letters.
If all things are equal i would be producing a lot of unused lettering in odd places, but i don’t im getting many plausible letters for each segments.
Sentences that start with the letter I for instance.
For the Z32 the first line clearly reads as "HAHA", To myself that was amazing as i only worked to figure out the allocation on symbols to which letter.
Yes, dyslexia is probably my first undiagnosed language.
This is related to RelentlessZ POI
It is a inferred possible form of encryption,
It is certainly not a critical aspect of RelentlesZ POI but rather my own interpretation of what it could be. I emboldened my own as the credibility of this is irrelevant to the credibility of that POI.
Yes, dyslexia is probably my first undiagnosed language.
