And another one, possibly related:

http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/ … gs-MYS.pdf

https://www.pyramidtextsonline.com/library.html

Look in here, some pages are only available to US IP addresses, i’ll try again with a VPN shortly.

Ok, so Stanford university in Cali seemingly has these books or books like this in their library…

Who is going to find these books and open it up to the last page and pull out the cards in the little envelope at the back which has the names and dates of those who borrowed these books previously?

Pretty cool right? the possibility that the Zodiacs name is sitting in the back of one of these books.

This book is very close in its content to the book i am speaking of, it may prove useful.

https://archive.org/details/egyptianhierogly01budguoft/page/cxxvi/mode/2up

So to explain it is the phonetic values and their interpretations.

Flip to page XVCi for an example of what is to be found in the book of the dead i speak of.

You might be able to play around with the dictionary that starts at the end of the roman numerals.

Anyway thankyou doranchak for your efforts, fairly confident ill find the book i am after that it is the one mentioned in the article on this website https://www.pyramidtextsonline.com/library.html

TImothie Ephe Ebert.

Timothy F. Ebert.

Now I see why some posters think his name is Tim or Robert.

Here are 3.

Timothie Ephe Ebirt
Timothie Ephe Tribe
Timothie Ephe Brite

Looking at it, especially if you plan to cross-reference it with the My Name Is cipher, you’re probably going to need a homophone. F (eph, ephe) seems like the natural candidate. B (Bee) and T (Tee) and P (Pee) also. Timothy seems like the most likely choice.

So also possibly:

Timothy F Ebert
Timothy F. Tribe
Timothy F. Bright

Just a thought …. you can see the words "the hipie" in there.

Keep in mind the "My Name is" cipher has an unusual number of bigrams in it for 13 letters.

Look at:
the Hippie

That’s 4 bigrams in 9 letters.

There are 3 bigrams and 1 tri-gram (is that the word?) in the My name is cipher.

Meet Robeet the hipie

Meet Robert the hipie.

Oh my. I’m starting another thread.

Oh my. I’m starting another thread.

Why? Nobody disagreed.

QT

Oh my. I’m starting another thread.

Why? Nobody disagreed.

QT

No problem. I just thought my answer would be worth a new thread.

http://zodiackillersite.com/viewtopic.php?f=81&t=4704

Solutions:
Z408 leftovers:
Meet Robeet the Hipie

Z13 My Name is:
ROBHTHEHIPPIE

The big thing is that you can see the words "The Hipie" in the Z408 leftovers. And "The Hippie" has four repeating pairs of letters in 9 total letters. That’s extremely helpful in a cipher that has 3 pairs and a triplet withing 13 letters, like the Z13. Assuming you only need to substitute and unscramble the puzzle.

If you are trying to find a mutual solution between the 13 and the 408. I think it will be hard to find a better, simpler answer. And it matches the desktop poem initials.

I never did buy into the filler hypothesis much. Seems to me the Zodiac would try to fit something in there.

So why doesn’t the Zodiac just reveal what it is if it is meaningless? Why doesn’t the Zodiac just claim it’s a filler? What’s he got to lose?

I think that is because it has meaning and he decided against revealing what it was.

I think he got lucky with the filler hypothesis. That sort of luck combined with all his mistakes and more luck there shows how the Zodiac was a low probability of not being apprehended back in the 60s. He should have been caught.

Anyway this is what I think the filler is and this is why I think he didn’t want to reveal it later. It was informative.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beep_Beep_(song)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Playmates

If we believe the 18 unsolved characters contained his identity as he claimed in the third part to the Chronicle of "In this cipher is my idenity", then we know his identity, because he stated very clearly "This is the Zodiac speaking" four days later on August 4th 1969. His identity was Zodiac.

We know that the original identity hidden at the foot of part three was meant to be 12 characters not 18, because he accidentally missed out the word "people" when moving from cipher section 2 to cipher section 3. Therefore his original identity was 12 characters that contained the word Zodiac.

It’s not that difficult to guess the introduction to his identity, to make up the 6 remaining characters. Look at how he began his introduction in the Chronicle, Examiner and Herald communications of July 31st 1969. This gives you the original answer he had for his 12 remaining characters.

However, he made the error transitioning from part 2 of the cipher, to part 3 of the cipher, thereby accidentally leaving 18 characters. His original message was easy to convert. I think we make the mystery behind these 18 characters far more complicated than it needs to be. The Zodiac Killer said he wouldn’t give us his name, but he would give us his identity – and we already knew his identity 4 days later – so any answer without this ingredient needs explaining.

An answer such as "Hi, I beep it the meteor" would need to be down scaled to 12 characters to fit the original intended meaning.

If we believe the 18 unsolved characters contained his identity as he claimed in the third part to the Chronicle of "In this cipher is my idenity", then we know his identity, because he stated very clearly "This is the Zodiac speaking" four days later on August 4th 1969. His identity was Zodiac.

I actually think he did give part of identity in it and is more of the same ‘will’ stuff we see elsewhere.

the best part of it is that when I die I will be reborn in paradise and all the (people) I have killed will become my slaves – I will not give you my name because you will try to slow down or stop my collecting of slaves for my afterlife.

Seems similar to the Exorcist’s tit-willo. Then we have Good Times and the Exorcist directed by William Friedkin and William Peter Blatty the author.

I think the use of will is also remarkable in the Bates Confession Letter. That stands out a bit also and happens to also appear in the title of the Desktop Poem.

I think casually masking his identity like this is part of his thrill. Subtle and not obvious and hard to prove.

Hi,

I’m one of the people who thinks that the last line is a filler. There are some arguments for this, especially the QEHM sequence and the repeated symbols ( http://zodiackillerciphers.com/images/l … filler.png).

However, yesterday I thought of something that speaks for a pure filler: At the beginning of part three, as you know, either a word or even a whole sentence is missing. Quote from the encyclopedia of observations:

Some plaintext appears to be missing directly in the boundary between Parts 2 and 3 of the cipher ("ALL THE ???? I HAVE KILLED WILL BECOME MY SLAVES")

Source: http://zodiackillerciphers.com/wiki/ind … servations

If Zodiac had planned an additional signature or a part to be decrypted separately when writing the plaintext, it would be shorter than the known remaining 18 characters. If the missing text between part 2 and part 3 is the word "PEOPLE", only 12 characters would originally have been available for the signature. If there is indeed still an undeciphered text at the end of z408, it should definitely be shorter than 18 characters.
So isn’t it very likely that he has ironed out the missing plaintext with a filler? This is faster than redrawing the entire third part.

Translated with http://www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)