It is exactly like the cipher itself. People made it hard because they didn’t want to follow the explicit instructions, for whatever reason. They had better ideas than what the Zodiac provided. They didn’t use computers. They didn’t consider that a simple but effective ranking step could and would point to the right place. But it did. The satellite imagery was a significant part of all of this.
Then came the rumor that he never buried anything, which was always baseless and just a rumor.
Same for taunting phrase plaintext theory, just a rumor.
He gave multiple intentional instructions on this one, no brainer.
I (David Stampher) found the needle in the haystack. It has been honor to be of service.
![]()
I propose IN THREE AND THREE EIGHTHS RADIANS TEN as the solution to the Z32 cipher. I’ve bought the domain, and I found the triangle. Go me.
Youtube series will be good but hard. There is a ton to say. But I will definitely be putting a small fraction of it into video format, for public consumption. No gatekeepers! Google Earth Studio is very cool and I think people will like that with this proposed solution. I do enjoy animating, even though it is not easy.
David Stampher revealed the triangle to a small fraction of the world on December 22, 2025, and has been stuck in limbo ever since.
The cipher itself isn’t very hard. It is, but it isn’t. What makes it hard is that Zodiac made a mistake, as he tended to do. This led to misinterpretation for a very long time. But if you look closely at the other context, we can understand he meant radial lines, not radians. Clock hours hint, “inches along the ‘radians'”
It all makes sense when you find the triangle landmark on the ground with my proposed solution.
The other thing that made Z32 absurdly hard was psychological resistance after it had been revealed. Being written off as natural origin, for example. This is now what I am very interested in. However, the radar test resolves all of these questions. Quick and easy. We will see about that natural origin. People will make up bonkers excuses to explain that thing away, and it is fascinating. Zodiac made that, bet 10 bucks.
Also I hope the experts don’t come out of the woodwork later on saying I am wrong due to multiple possible solutions ect, they knew about this months ago and ignored my emails. I tried to go through them first. They could have told me back then. It isn’t applicable here.
I have to keep pushing it forward even if people don’t get back to me. I assume they looked and didn’t find anything wrong, or I would have heard back.
For context, I think something might be buried in that triangle. That is why I submitted the tip, and that is why I am taking this seriously, unlike some others. Waiting around twiddling my thumbs for the experts to get back to me doesn’t feel good. At a certain point I assume they just aren’t going to respond, but I still need to move forward despite that, due to the implications. I am asserting that my proposed solution is correct and I haven’t heard otherwise in a meaningful way for 4 months. The natural origin debunk isn’t applicable unless the radar confirms that first.
You can’t do what shaq did and say “he didn’t use radians in the plaintext” and use that as an angle for saying what I shared is false. It doesn’t work like that.
And by “you”, I mean any troll that want’s to come around and tell me the cows made that triangle. Had it with them. It is nonsense.
I will still defend this thread against any trolls that come around in the future. This is my thread. It won’t be filled with any more stupid debunk theories about what I shared. You can’t argue against the truth. If you try, you will fail.
Always good to add another cool picture of the landmark David Stampher found, and shared on December 22, 2025.

What is in that inner circle?
If they scan it one day, we shall know.
I found it months ago and was largely ignored. Welcome to the internet.
What I have shared is empirical evidence. We can see the big landmark on the ground with our eyes. It matches the ciphertext triangle. Cool. I wonder who made it.
There won’t be any problems pointed out with the math or code, that ship has sailed. So I know I won’t be seeing any of that coming out of left field at least. Already been reviewed by people that would have said, “that is wrong, and here is why”.
It is just triangle origin debates. Subjective beliefs. Mine is the Zodiac origin.
Arguing against the real test. Lame. Four months reviewing a small codebase. Lame. Telling me cows made the triangle. Lame.
Lame, lame, lame across the board.
And that is just the tip of the iceberg.
If this leads to something good, hopefully I can create some change with all of this. It is all extra stuff on top.
And yeah I am going to be offended if the experts mostly treated my work like nothing of significance and it turned out to be correct. That would be very annoying.
I am asserting that it is correct, that IN THREE AND THREE EIGHTHS RADIANS TEN is the solution to Z32.
The experts are allowed to prove that wrong in here. But it can’t be based on subjective feelings. That is too easy.
It has been up for a month and I haven’t heard an expert tell me it is wrong, just origin theories and projection questions.
Someone told me they don’t think he used homophonic substitution.
Well, he did. Just like the other two.