I will just assert every day that is the correct solution until an expert proves it wrong. Four months.
I keep saying I am leaving, but actually this is the best place to just keep banging the drum. I will need to see some real falsification from experts as I have been waiting around. It hasn’t happened, and it has been seen. Not everyone said it was natural or due to cows, that is only a small set of a small sample size. Most chose silence, but some gave me enough information to know they didn’t find anything wrong. That is great, and I thank them for that. Maybe you can find something wrong? Hacker News didn’t.
Zodiac made that triangle, and I (David Stampher) solved Z32 in December. My work was silenced by the other forum administrator, which has led me here to document my efforts, as if this was my little journal.
Here is my paper: https://zenodo.org/records/18645227
And my code: https://github.com/dstampher/zodiac-z32-cipher
All experts are free to objectively falsify it. If they cannot do so, that is also good to know. At this point, I would be extremely surprised to hear of anything critically wrong. And for that reason, I don’t think there is anything critically wrong, and my proposed solution is the correct one. So I will keep running with that until proven otherwise.
Why am I being so assertive?
Because of the big physical landmark that matches the ciphertext symbol by Lake Herman Road. Radians and inches, like he said. It is all in perfect alignment, unless proven otherwise by experts. I don’t think it is going to happen. It could have been debunked awhile ago. We are in April now.
So each day the challenge will remain, specifically towards experts:
I have been waiting a long time to hear back from you. I do not know how to interpret silence. You have had time to review the work, and if there was anything wrong, I would have liked to hear that awhile ago. I don’t think there is anything critically wrong. I sent it to a variety of people, all of which were capable people, not internet forum users.
The codebase itself is what is most important, and is fairly simple. The whitepaper is just extra stuff for people that like to read.
During this period of silence, it has left to silly internet forum debates as I sit around.
And so as it has now been 4 months, I am asserting that my proposed solution IN THREE AND THREE EIGHTHS RADIANS TEN is the correct solution to Z32, and the triangle landmark should be scanned, so that we may know if anything is buried within the landmark by the decoded solution.
The experts can prove that wrong in this thread if they so please. If they do not, or cannot, then at a certain point I think it would be good to consider that I might be right.
And also, anyone with authority arguing against the ground truth test, should consider the ethical implications of potentially arguing against something that is both true and important. If you discourage the test and there actually is something there, that is not good. That should be considered as well. You don’t know, and neither do I. That is what the test is for.
And forgive me for any typos, at least you know that it is me writing these words. It really has been a long road waiting around like this. While retreating from this forums seemed like the right move the other day, I think throwing the gauntlet down is better. It has gone on for a long time (from my perspective).
It wasn’t what I wanted but it has just been four months now. So, if the experts are around, tell me why my proposed solution is wrong, and provide your alternative explanation for the landmark.
If that doesn’t happen within a reasonable timeframe, then I can at least say that I put it out there in a straightforward manner. Previously I had been more subdued about it, but now I am more directly requesting objective falsification from an expert, as soon as possible.
And again, consider the ethical implications of arguing against the ground truth test. That wouldn’t be very scientific.
And also, to any experts that might come by, I have noticed past oversights on here that are significant, and I hope that my proposed solution will be more carefully looked at, because I believe it is correct (due to the big landmark that makes it obvious, to me).
Are you an AI @coder1987? Or are you using some sort of AI to help you generate all of these posts? I’ve never seen anything quite like this before. It’s incredible.
Are you an AI @coder1987? Or are you using some sort of AI to help you generate all of these posts? I’ve never seen anything quite like this before. It’s incredible.
I am a human being with feelings.
Are you an AI?
What do you think of my proposed solution?
Let me guess, the cows made that triangle.
Get lost, troll.
Unless you are an expert objectively falsifying my work, leave the thread. I don’t want to hear your moronic debunks. This has been around for awhile, and been seen by people smarter than you. I don’t want to hear your natural origin nonsense.
What is incredible is the triangle landmark I found, and the plaintext I shared.
What is incredible is that you are a moron. @Irvine
We will see if they find something in the landmark one day. A human found that, me.
My name is David Stampher, and I propose IN THREE AND THREE EIGHTHS RADIANS TEN as the correct plaintext to the Z32 cipher. My code and paper is publicly available, and hasn’t been debunked by any experts to this very day.
I am also the proud owner of the domain INTHREEANDTHREEEIGHTHSRADIANSTEN.com, and so I actually own the solution. It is mine.
See my profile picture to see what I found.
My work is timestamped going back to December, as are my email records with those I shared it with, so I have plenty of receipts that I was first.
It was a great feeling to solve this cipher. The open challenge remains to all experts! They have had four months.
Soon my Youtube series will be going live, to solidify my victory. Experts had long enough to tell me, “it is wrong”. Never happened.
