And yeah, I am pissed, that is a fact.
Let’s go, experts. Bring it on. Been waiting…
Falsify the work, and provide your alternative explanation for the landmark.
I will be skeptical if this happens, and will wonder why no one else was able to do so over the past four months. There really is no good alternative explanation for the landmark. Either way, scan is the only way to know, so I’ve essentially been right this entire time. But just sitting around.
Maybe I am the only expert here.
Skip the paper, just look at the code and run it. Easy. I solved it.
Are people really this slow? Damn.
Dealing with internet forum users has been….the worst.
Really I just feel sad that people are so blind apparently. It is shockingly obvious. Holy cow.
IN THREE AND THREE EIGHTHS RADIANS TEN is the solution to the Z32 cipher.
I don’t feel like proposing it anymore. I did that for a long time.
And I am bumping the hell out of this thread for Google SEO. And just to bump it in general. Waiting for an expert to falsify this work has taken forever. And if it get’s checked out, I want that to be seen. It is ridiculous.
If someone finds a big landmark like that by LHR, they shouldn’t be sitting around for four months waiting to hear back from the experts. That should be engaged with much faster.
And due to the significance of this finding, the slowness is actually a bit offensive. I found something cool. It shouldn’t be ignored like that. It should be engaged with. It is a big physical landmark by the decoded coordinates. Why has this been overlooked and not engaged with properly? I would like to know that.
Why have I been met with stupid internet debunks on here? I want to know that as well. It is the dumbest thing ever.
Those came from people that tried and failed to solve Z32, while I succeeded.
And so, in my thread, which is built in honor to my work on Z32, which has mostly been ignored, I will again declare myself the hero of this story, despite popular belief.
I like what I did and still do, and don’t care if internet forum people want to tell me the triangle is of natural origin. Yeah right.
And again say to all experts:
When one day you get around to it, take a look at that triangle I found and let me know what you think. Tell me about any problems with the code or the math. Happy to chat. Been around for awhile.
Needless to say I didn’t come from internet forum land. It is probably against forum etiquette to keep bumping my thread but I will do so until someone actually takes the triangle seriously for once. Because this has been stupid and drawn out. Why do people not take this seriously? I do.
In fact, the unserious reception of this from others has been truly upsetting. I am on the other end. I do take this seriously. I don’t think of this as an internet forum game. And I don’t think it is good to be coming up with extremely bad debunk attempts to discourage it from being checked out.
I’ve been pushing for this to be checked out every day since I found it. What the hell is this? Really. And I am told these stupid reasons why my proposed solution is wrong? It is wrong because of cows? I don’t follow this logic.
This is a potentially serious thing, and should be treated as such, until PROVEN otherwise.
I don’t really care about being objective, I have become emotional now because I am offended by this for many reasons. I want that thing checked out. And I seem to be the only one. And if that is the case, I will keep yelling about it until someone listens.
Anyone reading this will not be able to know or comprehend the feeling, I promise you that. That is just for me to know.
But yes, the silence has been abysmal. Getting banned by an egotistical forum admin for nonsense reasons was typical internet BS. Where are the experts for proper evaluation of this potentially significant work? It has been seen elsewhere, no critical issues identified to this very day from multiple independent, unbiased, and qualified reviewers.
I’ve been left waiting around for four months. Only the code really matters and isn’t very complex.
