Any rocket scientists viewing this thread? Would love to hear from you.
All I’ve really got is cow theorist @shaqmeister
Someone else said natural origin, so I’m wrong.
Anyone else?
Since you have chosen to ping me again with a mention only to denigrate me, I shall respond one last time with a deduction.
You have written so much in the time that you have been with us, that it is possible at this point to be confident in taking a step back and reviewing just exactly what has been going on here. It might have been better for all of us, however, if you had just been honest from the start.
Your proposal has been given considerably more attention over the last month than it has merited based on your manner here. It is clear that you are passionate about your symbol in the grass, and it is clear that challenges to its possible origin and meaning are the ones that disturb you the most. And thus, fairly, you are keen to stick with what you have found.
With that said, however, it is also abundantly clear that, not David Stampher, but rather your AI Copilot is in fact the primary originator of both your code – as you have noted – and certainly your paper and the list of criteria you would have your reviewers stick to.
The manner of your presentation here and the form and wording of your paper betray nought that I can see that indicates commonality of origin. Nothing that we have seen, in your responses (or lack thereof) to a comprehensive slew of objective criticisms to the details of your offering, has given us the slightest indication that you actually have, not just the willingness to face objective review, but more importantly any real understanding of what you present as your own work to be able to do so.
I have come to realise that the frustrations of having tried to engage with you in honest discussion, such as they have been, have arisen not from anything that can at all be regarded as meaningful but difficult-to-address counterargument, but simply because the discussion has been had with you and not the Copilot that put all this together. Not one single point of valid objection has been taken up by you and offered a counter.
And, of course, there’s nothing at all wrong in working in this way and sharing the products of your efforts. It would just have been preferable, before coming into the lion’s den like this, if you had chosen to be upfront about it.
All the best to you.
Lol, are you saying I didn’t find the triangle?
Get out of here.
You are the natural origin guy.
I have been completely up front. I shared my research. I put a ton of time into this.
I started this research after AI already existed. Now when I find the triangle you say I didn’t solve it because I used a tool that everyone else has as well?
You are evil.
I found this triangle and I put a ton of work into this.
Trying to get my riled up, well you did.
I have been pretty much treated like garbage and I did great work.
I am tired of dealing with morons like you on internet forums @shaqmeister
You have been a deceptive piece of shit throughout.
First saying it is a cows watering hole, then saying it natural origin, then saying I didn’t solve it because I used a co-pilot.
Why don’t you fuck off?
People like you are a massive problem that I have ran into since I started putting this out there. Morons with literally the stupidest debunks that they think they are smart.
Why have no experts debunked my work in four months, but you are able to do so, so easily?
You aren’t as smart as you think you are and if my proposed solution is checked out you will look so stupid.
I was using AI before ChatGPT you god damn moron. I am a coder, we all use AI.
Get the fuck out of my thread.
Dealing with this shit for four months straight, damn.
Glad to bring this awesome research to the table and have to argue with people that used manual methods in the past.
Oh, and experts don’t respond.
So yeah this ended up being garbage. But at least I found the landmark.
And I solved this cipher in December 2025.
Won’t give up on what I found and yeah I’ve been pretty public about not appreciating all of the terrible debunks + silence + censorship.
True story.
I am spamming until @shaqmeisters attempt to discredit my work because I used a co-pilot, which I have happily admitted to (I don’t care, you yourself has used AI in this thread, hypocrite).
This guy keeps coming up with bullshit to try to derail things, he actually came back from 3 years of inactivity to do this.
So I will say it again, fuck you @shaqmeister, this time I’m not saying sorry.
My work is great, and I found the triangle. Me. David Stampher.
You didn’t find it because your attempts at solving Z32 failed, now you are mad, crying because I openly admitted to using a co-pilot (I don’t give a shit, the year is 2026).
You could have done the exact same thing, but you didn’t. And so you didn’t find the triangle.
Why did I find it and you didn’t, even though we all have the same tools? Maybe I am better than you with the tool. That is a skill issue on your end.
I will say fuck and bullshit when it is warranted. And it was warranted.
You referred to this place as a “lions den”. Oh please, this place is dormant. The only debunks have been cow watering hole and natural origin. That is about as weak as it gets.