By raising awareness it increases the probability of the landmark being scanned, verifying my personally confirmed solution. This should be obvious.
I don’t contact the experts anymore as the non-responses get interpreted as “no thanks”. After a certain period of time. They can respond here if they would like and falsify the work. However if there is something buried there, it must be checked out, my stance from day one. Arguing against the proper test to know the answer is what I have been dealing with @shaqmeister
Essentially if my solution is verified, this forum user will be on the record as having discouraged the scan that led to physical evidence recovery in this case.
And that would be due to my work, David Stampher. That is why I bought the solution domain.
The censorship on the other forums is highly questionable.
Shaqmeister treats the Z32 as a game, but I have taken it far more seriously than him. What he is not understanding is that if I am right, and he is wrong, then he is wrong in a major, major way. He argued against the correct Z32 solution before it was checked out properly.
That is essentially what this has boiled down to, me versus @shaqmeister
And he is wrong, and he has made many stupid counter arguments, which he continually generates when any were addressed.
I have been arguing with this guy for over a month on here, and here is his alternative proposal, which I DO NOT personally confirm.
My landmark by LHR is a million times more interesting than Twin Peaks.
IN THREE AND THREE EIGHTHS RADIANS TEN is the personally confirmed solution to the Z32 cipher.
Cracked by benevolent computer genius David Stampher in December 2025 using the Python programming language.
Code: https://github.com/dstampher/zodiac-z32-cipher
While I have posted silly GIF’s on here, that is to blend in with the environment of internet forums. The cipher itself and the personally confirmed solutions are both very serious things. Not to be so quickly debunked with silly origin theories on the landmark.
One of my favorite stupid debunks so far is that my personally confirmed solution is wrong because LHR has never been used by buses (according to them).
There is a mountain of bad debunks like that which discourage the landmark from being scanned. I created one where aliens made the landmark, so my personally confirmed solution is wrong. This is easy for anyone to do, they can just make up alternative explanations on the origin and run with that angle.
Another one of my favorite bad debunks is that my personally confirmed solution isn’t close enough to a road for their liking, as would be expected based on the sketches.
Meanwhile, we have Lake Herman Road nearby.
It has been a solid four and a half months of mostly just dealing with that kind of thing.
There is enough evidence to warrant engagement from experts, but that still has not arrived in a meaningful way. Again, I have essentially given up on them by now in that I won’t be reaching out further. There are other options to get this looked at properly. I need to just branch out. That takes planning as well. I don’t want to hit another dead end with my work where it gets ignored and censored.
Phillips 66 map rotated 17 degrees east.
IN THREE AND THREE EIGHTHS RADIANS TEN is the personally confirmed solution to the Z32 cipher. Solved by the honorable public servant David Stampher in December 2025.
Code: https://github.com/dstampher/zodiac-z32-cipher
Paper: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=6266638
The silliness the honorable public servant had to put up with along the way is also one for the history books.
Still waiting for the scan of course.
Now let’s compare again to @shaqmeister and his proposed solution. This is who I have been arguing with on dormant forums with for the past month, as the experts seem to just be sitting around in the background.
It is true I shouldn’t have bothered here when I realized it was dormant, but the domain is zodiackillerciphers.com, and so it felt relevant to my personally confirmed solution.
If my solution checks out it is one of the greatest contributions to the case and to the field.
And yet it has not been deemed worthy of engagement by experts after four and a half months?