This envelope is a little creepy, whats the context?
thought that too, the address is both his well i believe again another thing i don’t know but hope someone can explain.
truthfully the two things your have mentioned only became apparent when i was compressing the images, believe it or not.
Yes, dyslexia is probably my first undiagnosed language.
simplicity at some point you mentioned to me something about Harvey a sort of "how to get away with murder" type thing, something about using random killing to evade detection. I give up, my screen is dancing in front of my eye’s could you please direct me to it? 
simplicity at some point you mentioned to me something about Harvey a sort of "how to get away with murder" type thing, something about using random killing to evade detection. I give up, my screen is dancing in front of my eye’s could you please direct me to it?
It’s there, actually just mentioned it to relentless Z.
i won’t make the attempt today to look but it’s a paragraph in the mix easily over looked.
Yes, dyslexia is probably my first undiagnosed language.
This could be something. Maybe, but it requires a bit of stretching.
I’m not shocked by the opening sentence. But I suppose the overall meaning is that the pen is mightier than the sword. It does reveal a belief that his idea’s could live on. But to read it as hint for serial killing, it’s mighty big stretch. Unfortunately this is about the best I’ve seen so far. Hopefully there’s more.
The main problem I have with it is that it shows Harvey wanted the idea’s in his novel to live on. Now if he wanted to achieve that by being Z he would need to either put the novels idea’s in his Z letters, or leave sufficient evidence to be found after his death. He wouldn’t be likely to risk his novel falling into obscurity due to leaving insufficient Zodiac evidence behind. He’d want to ensure that it was discovered. Frankly I think the first scenario is more likely. If he was Z he’d have found a way to plug his book.
*
This could be something. Maybe, but it requires a bit of stretching.
I’m not shocked by the opening sentence. But I suppose the overall meaning is that the pen is mightier than the sword. It does reveal a belief that his idea’s could live on. But to read it as hint for serial killing, it’s mighty big stretch. Unfortunately this is about the best I’ve seen so far. Hopefully there’s more.
The main problem I have with it is that it shows Harvey wanted the idea’s in his novel to live on. Now if he wanted to achieve that by being Z he would need to either put the novels idea’s in his Z letters, or leave sufficient evidence to be found after his death. He wouldn’t be likely to risk his novel falling into obscurity due to leaving insufficient Zodiac evidence behind. He’d want to ensure that it was discovered. Frankly I think the first scenario is more likely. If he was Z he’d have found a way to plug his book.
I don’t think he was Zodiac, but it’s possible he might have killed someone during his lifetime. I’m just putting things here I find that might show a potential for him to be a murderer, as most of his stuff is nonsense. Occasionally I find things like this however. This guy had a serious hate of women and there is a constant mention of rape, prostitution, pregnancy, abortion and how women use men.
Your on the right track, keep these things in mind.
And no, that’s not what i was referring to about the "how to MO to serious crimes" it’s one paragraph in the mix.
Yes, dyslexia is probably my first undiagnosed language.
Eh, you could read it as an academic interest, or artistic catharsis. He goes just as hard on men in his thesis. I get the vibe he has an odd begrudging respect for modern women and the power they hold. I think he see’s women as much more worthy adversaries, then "gelding" men. He’s a deep guy. If you looked at my wife’s art you’d probably think she hated men. Take a walk on the wild side. It’s hard know when he’s being facetious too, I think he probably was facetious. Actually Z is very facetious, but Z was much more ham-fisted about it.
He could be a killer, or just an old fashion arty intellectual curmudgeon.
Eh, you could read it as an academic interest, or artistic catharsis. He goes just as hard on men in his thesis. I get the vibe he has an odd begrudging respect for modern women and the power they hold.
I think he see’s women as much more worthy adversaries, then "gelding" men.
.
Yes absolutely, but he does a full circle and his thoughts get solidfied on how the modern world works and why.
He separates it between the genetic code – the innate – a child not yet taught by society and you will find his exploration into how society learns.
The abortion topic, there’s a brilliant but wordy typed document of his regarding the influence of words interestingly the insights he speaks about youth who don’t even own a dictionary yet who are going for a abortion.
The youth are told it’s not a baby it’s a fetus and a fetus is not human. And he explains why the words are wrong and how incorrect use of words create a hallucination of meanings, but they don’t mean anything.
Let’s be clear, a hallucination of meanings has changed society a infant changed from that of a human being to that of a cockroach killed off as required.
Now i’ll do a full circle, yes it looks just academic but soon i hope you find more depth on the subject on how he sees societies and more important individuals who make up society learn.
In the end it formulates a book where all the pages # have been mixed up.
Yes, dyslexia is probably my first undiagnosed language.
Eh, you could read it as an academic interest, or artistic catharsis. He goes just as hard on men in his thesis. I get the vibe he has an odd begrudging respect for modern women and the power they hold. I think he see’s women as much more worthy adversaries, then "gelding" men. He’s a deep guy. If you looked at my wife’s art you’d probably think she hated men. Take a walk on the wild side. It’s hard know when he’s being facetious too, I think he probably was facetious. Actually Z is very facetious, but Z was much more ham-fisted about it.
He could be a killer, or just an old fashion arty intellectual curmudgeon.
It’s a very repetitive theme with this guy. Couple that with the letter his ex wife sent him, and that it seems other women he knew didn’t want anything more to do with him, it seems much more than just being artsy.
He’s a deep guy.
He’s a word salad expert with a superficial hangup about sex.
deleted, i did not need to split hairs.
Yes, dyslexia is probably my first undiagnosed language.
Eh, you could read it as an academic interest, or artistic catharsis. He goes just as hard on men in his thesis. I get the vibe he has an odd begrudging respect for modern women and the power they hold. I think he see’s women as much more worthy adversaries, then "gelding" men. He’s a deep guy. If you looked at my wife’s art you’d probably think she hated men. Take a walk on the wild side. It’s hard know when he’s being facetious too, I think he probably was facetious. Actually Z is very facetious, but Z was much more ham-fisted about it.
He could be a killer, or just an old fashion arty intellectual curmudgeon.
It’s a very repetitive theme with this guy. Couple that with the letter his ex wife sent him, and that it seems other women he knew didn’t want anything more to do with him, it seems much more than just being artsy.
He’s a deep guy.
He’s a word salad expert with a superficial hangup about sex.
You put it better than I did.
