I will restart with some good stuff, this is only for those who arent inclined to do the reading.

Somethings require context, i cant offer one here.

…

Bit more relevant to the time,
Named "Dr Kindschi"

Named:"Dr Kindschi"

…

Smart people can be very manipultive, they have the ability to run differnet programs on the same computer.

In saying that, some of his phone call in 64 relate to a wig shop in Arcata i beleive, and i also believe relentless has mentioned to me seeing him drive off from his home many years ago with a full beard whilst wearing a wig.

Some of my findings lead me to beleive he may of been a crossdresser but i think he may have worn disguises or played dress up? i dont know, i can pull up the phone records for you.

Given the fact that he tracked and stalked his ex-girlfriends, I see a totally different use of fake beards and wigs from him. Plus all Zodiac composites show him with short hair and no facial hair.

Smart people can be very manipultive, they have the ability to run differnet programs on the same computer.

In saying that, some of his phone call in 64 relate to a wig shop in Arcata i beleive, and i also believe relentless has mentioned to me seeing him drive off from his home many years ago with a full beard whilst wearing a wig.

Some of my findings lead me to beleive he may of been a crossdresser but i think he may have worn disguises or played dress up? i dont know, i can pull up the phone records for you.

Given the fact that he tracked and stalked his ex-girlfriends, I see a totally different use of fake beards and wigs from him. Plus all Zodiac composites show him with short hair and no facial hair.

Regarding the beard, im talking late 70’s / 80’s.

The wig shop phone call was during a time when he was not tracking any ex partner, early 1964, from everything i can see it doesnt seem like he was stalking any ex at that time, and it only begins later on.

This period is irrelevent to the Zodiac, then.

This period is irrelevent to the Zodiac, then.

yes wigs have a expiry date, purchase of one in 64 by a man with a full head of hair not relevant, santa rosa hitch hiker murders not thought to be linked to zodiac, nothing to see here.

You know how far-fetched these assumptions are.

You know how far-fetched these assumptions are.

To be clear my last one was sarcasim incase theres any confusion.

I know what im looking at, what ever is to be determined by others takes time, whatever will be will be.

#1 Anyway Harveys mother remarried to a Edward Marshall decades prior to this envelope rick marshall link unknown still.

#2 you tell me what is going on here. what abstraction? and why #4 and #5? what might that mean? edit: I believe this one is prior 1970, I will come back and confirm.

# 3 And just something random.

You know how far-fetched these assumptions are.

I want to reply to you again, do you know how weak your commentry is?

And what assumptions? he a man with a full head of hair seemingly purchases a wig in 64.

RelentlessZ is a eye witness to him wearing wigs in public and basically wearing a disguise, hes not going to a dress up party several times a year.

Yeah sure he was stalking his ex partners, you make the fault by thinking that a man who did that is somehow excused from being considered from doing other things. What he was busy stalking only his EX’s? there’s no time for other oddities? a man who stalks ex partners who RUN from him is not suspicious?

Where are the Assumption? Is it with you assuming this fragment of details is the corner stone of what is happening here?

Weren’t you the one who wanted to see his car magazine collection? good grief! is this a riverside connection you seek? check your bearings.

People get upset when I retort, they think its because they are asking hard questions or something, no its very much the opposite ask hard questions.

ask about his guns, ask more in depth about his locations, ask about his vehicles,

find something tangible to blow everything out of the water, I want that.

ill respond for you claypools, why don’t you simplicity find something more tangible?

I can’t, its all circumstantial and it will be because something’s are beyond my capabilities,

with that said,I believe there is substantial amounts of circumstantial to warrant further investigation by those who can and law enforcement hopefully, that’s all that can be done here.

The assumptions I’m talking about is you making an imaginary link between Zodiac and the hitchhikers murders.

I already asked about what cars he used to drive, if he had many, etc. I was answered it’s easy to switch cars. Why not.

You talk about his disguises, but is it still disguising if you wear it in front of your whole neighborhood? I take it as the actions of a strange guy, everybody has already had a loony like that on their street.
Zodiac didn’t wear wigs or fake facial hair, at the very least maybe he wore extra layers of clothes to look fatter than he actually was. You could assume after almost being caught in Presidio Heights and the police having such a good composite of him, he decided to hide his face with wigs and fake beards to keep doing his thing, but again, that would more assumptions.

EDIT: if you will do both questions and answers, what’s the use?