Last seen: April 19, 2026 9:01 pm
If Zodiac made that landmark, then my solution is correct. If experts want to debunk it I need to hear an alternative explanation for the landmark. …
Anyways one way to know if my solution is right is to just scan the triangle. That would put “taunting phrase theory” to bed as well.
I realize that is technically true, but it is highly improbable given what I have found. I would think experts realize this? Hope so. They must.
I realize an expert could just say, “how do we know he didn’t encrypt a taunting phrase instead?”. I file this under bad debunk, due to all of the c…
The right way to do this is what you see expressed in the code I shared.
And there are many ways to point to the wrong place. There is only one right way to do this.
An objective falsification is a different story, to be clear. That is a legitimate debunk. If I pointed to the wrong place and that is provable, ma…
Bad debunkers won’t sway me but they can still try.
And I do thank any mods for at least not censoring my thread and letting me spam it. I realize that is easy to just click a button and make it go awa…
And so if some people would prefer to talk about Black Dahlia, ALA sketches, ect, ect rather than the landmark I found, that is cool. But I will keep…
Still my work has mostly been ignored (for now). This is due to early roadblocks that led to frustration. Forum battles were draining because it is …
Best case scenario, my solution checks out, leads to physical evidence, which leads to identification. To be clear, I am not betting on that last pa…
This actually increases the historical value of Z340, which already was there beforehand. But we all know the plaintext was a disappointment. It too…
And so if my solution checks out that will be the legacy of Z340. While it was a taunt/lie, the solving of it generated enough public interest for so…
And so it is true to say that it would be highly unlikely for Z32 to be solved in December 2025, had Z340 not been solved in December 2020. They are …