Zodiac Discussion Forum

Notifications
Clear all

Infallible DNA?

7 Posts
7 Users
0 Reactions
2,721 Views
(@david-rayd)
Posts: 8
Active Member
Topic starter
 

I’m not suggesting this article would strongly imply that Arthur Leigh Allen just might be THE ZODIAC. It’s just that 2002 forensic technology might need a another look.

http://www.wzzm13.com/story/news/crime/ … r/7018837/

 
Posted : April 5, 2014 7:57 am
(@nachtsider)
Posts: 367
Reputable Member
 

The DNA doesn’t matter to me. His prints didn’t match, and neither does his personality.

 
Posted : April 5, 2014 4:44 pm
(@danmyers22)
Posts: 30
Trusted Member
 

The DNA doesn’t matter to me. His prints didn’t match, and neither does his personality.

Personality? He doesnt come across as a person with the most pleasant personality I have to say.

 
Posted : May 17, 2015 4:06 am
Tahoe27
(@tahoe27)
Posts: 5315
Member Moderator
 

The DNA doesn’t matter to me. His prints didn’t match, and neither does his personality.

Personality? He doesnt come across as a person with the most pleasant personality I have to say.

Maybe psychologically? Being a pedophile?


…they may be dealing with one or more ersatz Zodiacs–other psychotics eager to get into the act, or perhaps even other murderers eager to lay their crimes at the real Zodiac’s doorstep. L.A. Times, 1969

 
Posted : May 17, 2015 4:26 am
Quicktrader
(@quicktrader)
Posts: 2598
Famed Member
 

The DNA doesn’t matter to me. His prints didn’t match, and neither does his personality.

Yes, he was an insane squirrel killer!

QT

*ZODIACHRONOLOGY*

 
Posted : May 17, 2015 10:52 am
(@finder)
Posts: 21
Eminent Member
 

The DNA doesn’t matter to me. His prints didn’t match, and neither does his personality.

Personality? He doesnt come across as a person with the most pleasant personality I have to say.

Maybe psychologically? Being a pedophile?

Aside from the evidence that doesn’t seem to align with Allen, much like pedophiles, Zodiac was a silent watcher of others.

 
Posted : May 19, 2015 5:32 am
(@jroberson)
Posts: 333
Reputable Member
 

I’m not suggesting this article would strongly imply that Arthur Leigh Allen just might be THE ZODIAC. It’s just that 2002 forensic technology might need a another look.

http://www.wzzm13.com/story/news/crime/ … r/7018837/

That article doesn’t say why the previous DNA test didn’t implicate Slazinski, nor does it say anything about the new DNA results, if there are any. All it says is that there’s a reasonably likely chance Slazinski committed the murder.

So I’m not really sure what this has to do with ALA. Certainly Allen was cleared on fingerprints, handwriting, voice, physical identification (aside from Mageau many years later and after what appeared to be a very hard life), et cetera. No one was even ever able to place ALA at any of the crime scenes. All they ever had was some sleazebag criminal’s self-serving claims and a superficially probative narrative from Allen’s erstwhile friend, who had very good reason to smear Allen.

I do admit that ALA does fit some if not many of the expected personality traits, though, and his residence inside Vallejo is pretty much what one would imagine with respect to the domicile of the Zodiac.

 
Posted : May 19, 2015 7:34 am
Share: