I wish there was a block function on this site.

Done.

That’s the most beneficial thing you’ve offered this site. Thank you and good bye.

I made no appeal to me being a scientist here.

.

Umm, you remember those umpteen private messages you sent me telling me how brilliant you are and how stupid everyone else here is? Well, I still got ’em. Here, in your own words, and there’s plenty more.

I am a scientist. I deal with Covid 19 mutations using software tracking phylogeny. You don’t have any real scientists on zw.com like me because you abused them all. All you have are computer engineers left. That is why you go around approving of calling DNA a cell and making all sorts of pseudo scientific claims. Oh that is if you are not part of your camp that is in full scientific denial over the DNA and print evidence. There is nothing you can do to stop my research. It’s bigger than you. Bigger than you and your little troll group of uneducated cyberstalkers.

I made no appeal to me being a scientist here.

.

Umm, you remember those umpteen private messages you sent me telling me how brilliant you are and how stupid everyone else here is? Well, I still got ’em. Here, in your own words, and there’s plenty more.

I am a scientist. I deal with Covid 19 mutations using software tracking phylogeny. You don’t have any real scientists on zw.com like me because you abused them all. All you have are computer engineers left. That is why you go around approving of calling DNA a cell and making all sorts of pseudo scientific claims. Oh that is if you are not part of your camp that is in full scientific denial over the DNA and print evidence. There is nothing you can do to stop my research. It’s bigger than you. Bigger than you and your little troll group of uneducated cyberstalkers.

Where does it say I think everyone else here is stupid?

Nowhere.

You can’t reference properly either.

It’s really not that hard to do. You read something and you quote it. Saying something that isn’t in there and then putting up a quote without it is not how referencing works.

This is a constant problem for team TV for the past few decades. Referencing correctly and sourcing properly with the right quotes is not anathema in research. It is not something to detest.

The only people who want to avoid that are people who want to make things up. I know you don’t like me because of my POI. Big deal. I know you don’t like me because I don’t let this slide when it comes to proper referencing.

Anyway you won’t keep it on zw.com like the mods tell you. The fact you need to be on this great site running repeats says it all.

I am a biologist. A scientist. My background is in molecular and cell biology including phylogenics and evolutionary research which is what goes on with familial DNA analysis. It also involves statistics.

Anyway you won’t keep it on zw.com like the mods tell you.

What is zw.com?

I know you don’t like me because of my POI.

I’d guess it has more to do with you being a liar and a kook and a hypocrite, not to mention an intellectual thief. I love your POI, it’s great comic relief. You? You’re a kook.

No quotes, dismiss.

No references, dismiss.

BTW, when it comes to being duped, why call people fools? They are victims of duplicity, dishonestly and maybe even victims of espionage and sabotage depending.

Did I call someone a fool over people being duped by a fake Hartnell claiming to recognize Gaikowski’s voice?

No I didn’t.

The hypocrisy would be leaving me like this if I did.

Did I call someone a fool over people being duped by a fake Hartnell claiming to recognize Gaikowski’s voice?

I wasn’t the one who was fooled, and Destry Hines has already apologized for it.

Speaking of being fooled, how is Sal LaBarbara doing these days? Are you two still e-mail buddies?

And one more question Mr. Scientist, what scientific formula did you use to conclude I was in on your getting fooled by a fake Sal LaBarbara? Because I had nothing to do with it.

IMO, they don’t have anything to apologize for. Whoever did that to them should be the one apologizing. It is sick.

TV, I am putting you back on ignore for your own good. I will leave you with the words I left with you the last time.

I don’t care about your POI. I don’t care about your ‘research’. I don’t care what you have to say about my ‘research’ either. None of those things can have any impact on what I am doing and doesn’t either.

If I was you I would go about proving your big claims about Gaikowski is the Zodiac and less time complaining about other people and their POIs. It doesn’t make your POI any better if you haven’t noticed.

If I was you I would go about proving your big claims about Gaikowski

Better than delusions.

*There is literally no evidence the Halloween card is a puzzle — or a code– to be "solved"
*The skeletons are not dancing
*The mask is not red
*The cattle brand is not copied
*Neither is a death wheel copied
*Correctional officers are not "L.E." nor are they trained like actual cops

You put junk in a blender and got two names that you decided to combine for some reason. Absolute junk science from a junk scientist.

I’ve seen lots of nuttery since I began researching this case, but you are by far the biggest of all kooks. And the best part is you pretend to be a "scientist."

Carry on, it’s hilarious!

BTW – I don’t visit the site you linked anymore. Haven’t in months.

According the this screenshot that I just took, you last logged-in a week and a half ago. In science, a week and a half does not equal "months."

Gosh, you just can’t stop yourself from lying, can you? Buyer beware!

People trying to get positively famous over this case is so disgusting. Young persons were killed, you should pay them some respect instead of behaving like fat drunk football fans from opposite teams at a bar counter on a sunday night

People trying to get positively famous over this case is so disgusting. Young persons were killed, you should pay them some respect instead of behaving like fat drunk football fans from opposite teams at a bar counter on a sunday night

Do you ever offer anything of substance? You introduced Gaikowski into this discussion, out of the blue. Yet you don’t have the guts to make a substantive comment of why. Get with it or get lost.

Why? Because he’s your current POI, if I’m not mistaken.

Why? Because he’s your current POI, if I’m not mistaken.

Ok…you brought him up…offer something to the discussion. Why is he a good suspect? Why is he a bad suspect? Anything?