IN THREE AND THREE EIGHTHS RADIANS TEN is the solution to the Z32 cipher.  It was solved by the world famous computer enthusiast David Stampher in December 2025.  David Stampher used highly sophisticated computational techniques to break the impossible code.

Proof:   https://github.com/dstampher/zodiac-z32-cipher

David Stampher was smart enough to purchase the domain INTHREEANDTHREEEIGHTHSRADIANSTEN.com and obtain a DOI for timestamp purposes, and his brilliant work on the Z32 cipher continues to this very day.

Where is Faycal to falsify my work.

So anyway, since it appears you are intent in showing up in my feed daily, I thought it might lessen the frustration on both sides if we just chewed the fat a little? How does that seem, just to pass the time while you wait for your confirmation and I wait to be able to post other stuff without getting spam-swamped every time? Up for it?

Ancient Greek translation:

“IN THREE AND THREE EIGHTHS RADIANS TEN” λύσις ἐστὶ τοῦ Z32 κρυπτογραφήματος. Ἐλύθη δὲ ὑπὸ τοῦ παγκοσμίως ἐπιφανοῦς φιλομαθοῦς περὶ λογιστικὰς μηχανάς, David Stampher, κατὰ Δεκέμβριον τοῦ 2025 ἔτους. David Stampher τέχναις λογιστικαῖς πάνυ σοφαῖς ἐχρήσατο πρὸς τὸν ἀδύνατον κώδικα λῦσαι.

Proof: https://github.com/dstampher/zodiac-z32-cipher

David Stampher ἱκανῶς σοφὸς ἦν ὥστε τὸ χωρίον INTHREEANDTHREEEIGHTHSRADIANSTEN.com πρίασθαι καὶ DOI λαβεῖν πρὸς τὸν χρόνον σφραγίσασθαι, καὶ τὸ λαμπρὸν αὐτοῦ ἔργον περὶ τοῦ Z32 κρυπτογραφήματος μέχρι τῆσδε τῆς ἡμέρας ἔτι συνεχίζεται.

Posted by: @shaqmeister

↑

So anyway, since it appears you are intent in showing up in my feed daily, I thought it might lessen the frustration on both sides if we just chewed the fat a little? How does that seem, just to pass the time while you wait for your confirmation and I wait to be able to post other stuff without getting spam-swamped every time? Up for it?

That’s fine @shaqmeister.  My frustration is more towards the situation rather than you.

You said natural origin, that is fine.  You can think that if you want.

You aren’t the one that decides if it gets scanned or not.

I actually felt bad about saying the f word to you, sorry about that.  Not cool.  I have been sleeping like crap is the problem, and so I become agitated.  That improved last night so I’m less bad now.

Good to hear you’re sleeping better. Always important to get good sleep so we can function properly. And I won’t mention anything about the origin of anything, natural or otherwise.

Posted by: @shaqmeister

↑

Good to hear you’re sleeping better. Always important to get good sleep so we can function properly. And I won’t mention anything about the origin of anything, natural or otherwise.

You are free to mention anything you’d like. 

We are both here, rather than on the other forums.  That is a good start.

And thank you for the kind words about the sleep.  It’s the worst part of all of this.  Legit insomnia began after finding the triangle.  It oscillates.  Being a curious person, I can’t help but wonder what might be there.

Since I am sitting around bored and we’ve been chatting about it, sometimes in a friendly way, I will just say Zodiac mentioned a potential “victom” being buried.  “Death Machine” could be a metaphor of some sort.  A “bomb” doesn’t have to be literal, either.

No clue what may or may not be there.  This is the thing keeping me up.

I’ve spent quite a bit of time theorizing.  Obviously that isn’t worth mention.  In the Z32 letter he mentioned a .38, finding one here would prove he wasn’t lying.  Just a thought, I wouldn’t bet on it (because I have no clue).

I wanted to ask you about one specific aspect of your model. Not to challenge it, but just to get an idea of where it comes from. Your code completes on the assumption that, of the remaining possibilities, it pulls out the one that is nearest to previous known Zodiac crime locations. I think I’ve come across that once before, but was wondering where it comes from. Is it based on Rossmo’s geographical profiling from some years back?

Posted by: @shaqmeister

↑

I wanted to ask you about one specific aspect of your model. Not to challenge it, but just to get an idea of where it comes from. Your code completes on the assumption that, of the remaining possibilities, it pulls out the one that is nearest to previous known Zodiac crime locations. I think I’ve come across that once before, but was wondering where it comes from. Is it based on Rossmo’s geographical profiling from some years back?

It comes from the idea that the best way to select the unique solution is to rely on objective physical reality to decide the winner, and it did.

Posted by: @coder1987

↑

Since I am sitting around bored and we’ve been chatting about it, sometimes in a friendly way, I will just say Zodiac mentioned a potential “victom” being buried.  “Death Machine” could be a metaphor of some sort.

Could you remind me where to find this reference? I have the letters to hand, but can’t remember where I’ve seen “victom.”

It has nothing to do with Rossmo.  I sent him my paper.  I would say the ranking step would be considered logical by most people that are familiar with criminal behavior, he is one among many.

Posted by: @coder1987

↑

It comes from the idea that the best way to select the unique solution is to rely on objective physical reality to decide the winner, and it did.

And by “objective physical reality,” do you mean, like, the thing found there?

Posted by: @shaqmeister

↑

Posted by: @coder1987

↑

Since I am sitting around bored and we’ve been chatting about it, sometimes in a friendly way, I will just say Zodiac mentioned a potential “victom” being buried.  “Death Machine” could be a metaphor of some sort.

Could you remind me where to find this reference? I have the letters to hand, but can’t remember where I’ve seen “victom.”

It was the “Little List” letter, mailed on July 26, 1970. In that letter, Zodiac wrote, “a victom must be found” and followed it with “who might well be underground,” which is the part that suggests a potentially buried victim.

The same letter with the Radians and Inches post script instructions.