Zodiac Discussion Forum

Notifications
Clear all

Today's visit to Lake Herman Road

106 Posts
23 Users
0 Reactions
12.2 K Views
morf13
(@morf13)
Posts: 7527
Member Admin
 

Also, one casing was found on what would looks to be the opposite side of the other car parked there….the side closest to the fence. That would make it appear as if it was fired from the passenger side of the other car. COULD there have been two people?

See these two link:

http://www.zodiackiller.com/LHRPR4.html

http://www.zodiackiller.com/LHRPR5.html

OR,as I have wondered, could Zodiac’s car have been backed in? If it was backed in and zodiac got out of his Driver’s side, and fired a shot in the air(or in any direction),that shell casing would have landed right around where it was found.

There is more than one way to lose your life to a killer

http://www.zodiackillersite.com/
http://zodiackillersite.blogspot.com/
https://twitter.com/Morf13ZKS

 
Posted : January 5, 2014 1:28 am
(@craigfitzer)
Posts: 133
Estimable Member
Topic starter
 

Could the casing that was 20 feet away have been the last shot and not first? Z is getting back into his vehicle and notices BL rollover on her side or hears her and decides to take one last shot for good measure.

 
Posted : January 5, 2014 3:42 am
traveller1st
(@traveller1st)
Posts: 3583
Member Moderator
 

Traveller – You said "I was pitch black wasn’t it?" As we know it can be almost as light as day when the moon is full and fairly light on a half moon, which really could change how we look at everything if that were the case on December 20th 1968. But if you check out the chart below you’ll see that you are right it would have been "pitch" black, almost no moon.

Sorry, if this is old news.

Probably for some but not for me. By that I mean I hadn’t previously checked if it had been the case. Thanks, nice illustration to include too. Certainly corroborates Z’s claims in his second letter of Aug 4th ’69 about it being ‘dark’.


I don’t know Chief, he’s very smart or very dumb.

 
Posted : January 8, 2014 5:45 am
Tahoe27
(@tahoe27)
Posts: 5315
Member Moderator
 

The police report reads there was a "blood splattered path on her attempted escape route".

http://www.zodiackiller.com/LHRPR9.html

Had Zodiac driven in between the Rambler and Betty Lou, wouldn’t there have been evidence of that in the blood?


…they may be dealing with one or more ersatz Zodiacs–other psychotics eager to get into the act, or perhaps even other murderers eager to lay their crimes at the real Zodiac’s doorstep. L.A. Times, 1969

 
Posted : January 8, 2014 6:03 am
morf13
(@morf13)
Posts: 7527
Member Admin
 

The police report reads there was a "blood splattered path on her attempted escape route".

http://www.zodiackiller.com/LHRPR9.html

Had Zodiac driven in between the Rambler and Betty Lou, wouldn’t there have been evidence of that in the blood?

Wow,that’s a good point, so maybe Zodiac parked behind them like at BRS. If so, this would cast doubt on Owen’s statement. He saw two cars side by side, and 30 seconds later,claims he heard that shot. There is no time for Z to suddenly jump in his car, back it up, get out and shoot in 30 seconds, which is what he would have had to do to avoid backing thru the blood. I wonder if any cops asked the question Tahoe did?? Wonder if they have better quality in depth photos?

There is more than one way to lose your life to a killer

http://www.zodiackillersite.com/
http://zodiackillersite.blogspot.com/
https://twitter.com/Morf13ZKS

 
Posted : January 8, 2014 6:39 am
ace ventura
(@ace-ventura)
Posts: 435
Honorable Member
 

What are we talking about ?
in the Cold Case files #1 ( which is hard to find taken off most video web sites now ) the Detective states David’s Rambler station wagon was pulled in head first -it is still parked there in the video. The killers car said to be parked to the right of it .
David is led out of the driver side and taken to the R side of the rambler behind the RR door and shot in the head . which causes Betty to then try to escape out the drivers door unless she wanted to run into Z . Doing so gave Z time to get around to the other side to shoot her running away to the left of the Rambler .

 
Posted : January 8, 2014 7:27 am
morf13
(@morf13)
Posts: 7527
Member Admin
 

What are we talking about ?
in the Cold Case files #1 ( which is hard to find taken off most video web sites now ) the Detective states David’s Rambler station wagon was pulled in head first -it is still parked there in the video. The killers car said to be parked to the right of it .
David is led out of the driver side and taken to the R side of the rambler behind the RR door and shot in the head . which causes Betty to then try to escape out the drivers door unless she wanted to run into Z . Doing so gave Z time to get around to the other side to shoot her running away to the left of the Rambler .

The Rambler WAS pulled in head first. Owen claims that Zodiac’s car was parked to the right of it either 3-4 feet to the right, or 10 feet (depending on which of Owen’s two statements you believe, as he stated both 3-4 & 10). Police worked out a scenario in which Zodiac ordered them out thru the passenger side door,shot Dave immediately, and then as Betty ran towards the main road (away from the Rambler),zodiac shot her in the back, and she fell. Zodiac would then have needed to backed his car out, avoiding the bodies, and presumably somehow, not driving thru a puddle or stream of blood. That is what Tahoe & I were talking about,the report mentioned a line of blood from Betty’s wounds as she ran, and indeed, if you look very closely at the police sketch, there is a faintly drawn blood trail on the sketch.I am including a comparison of the sketches, witness views, etc, and hopefully it wont be too confusing.

A couple questions come to mind,first off, if Betty was shot all those times in the back and fell to the ground, how fast would that blood puddle/stream have formed? Assuming Z got right back in his car, and backed out, would there be a blood puddle there already for him to drive thru? What Tahoe and I were wondering, (at least I am wondering)is what if Zodiac parked directly behind the couple as he did at BRS? He could have walked up to the couple on the passenger side, just at BRS. Betty rolls down her window, and Z orders them out. Maybe Dave makes a move, starts the car, or whatever, and Zodiac facing the passenger side door and facing LHR, fires a warning shot to get them out, that shell casing would eject to the right,and maybe slightly back but not likely over towards where that stray casing was found. Once the couple slid out of the pass side, Zodiac would have turned around now to get behind them, and his right side would now be facing LHR. If he shoots at this point Dave immediately, and Betty as she ran, all the casings would wind up in a tight group as the evidence shows they did, but they likely would have ejected to the right of the gun, perhaps towards the hood of Dave’s car, which didnt seem to be the case. The problem with this entire scenario is, it completely would clash with Owen’s story. He flat out says the car was on the right of Dave’s car, and 30 seconds after he went by the scene, he heard the shot. Z couldnt have been parked behind the Rambler IF Owen is being honest, and if Owen is not being honest,he likely is Zodiac.

My next question, based on the tight area between the gate and the road, Dave’s car would be easy to see,but what about Zodiac’s if it was 3-4 ft from Dave’s or 10 feet from Dave’s? How hard would it be for Zodiac to back out of that spot avoiding blood & bodies if he was either 3-4 ft away from Dave’s car or 10 ft?
And lastly, if Zodiac really was parked behind Faraday’s, how close to the road would he have been? Hanging out in the road? What if Z parked paralell to LHR, instead of pulling directly behind Dave? This scenario would block Dave in, but not blind him with headlights, then zodiac could jump in his car and get out quick with no danger of running over bodies, blood, etc, but again, if Zodiac was parked anyplace but to the right of Dave’s Rambler, Owen is lying, and again, if he is lying, he is likely zodiac. In the end, maybe Zodiac attacked at BRS, the same way he attacked at LHR, pulled up behind, got out, walked up to the pass side of the victim’s car. This merits further research & discussion

There is more than one way to lose your life to a killer

http://www.zodiackillersite.com/
http://zodiackillersite.blogspot.com/
https://twitter.com/Morf13ZKS

 
Posted : January 8, 2014 11:40 am
BuckwheatFlowers
(@buckwheatflowers)
Posts: 172
Estimable Member
 

I don’t see how the car could have been only 3-4 feet away from the rambler. David’s body was laying perpendicular to the rambler. How tall was he? Another car would have to have been farther away than David was tall in my opinion. Or else he would have ran over Faraday’s head backing (or pulling) out.

 
Posted : January 8, 2014 5:09 pm
Wolf 49
(@wolf-49)
Posts: 19
Eminent Member
 

Traveller – You said "I was pitch black wasn’t it?" As we know it can be almost as light as day when the moon is full and fairly light on a half moon, which really could change how we look at everything if that were the case on December 20th 1968. But if you check out the chart below you’ll see that you are right it would have been "pitch" black, almost no moon.

Sorry, if this is old news.

Probably for some but not for me. By that I mean I hadn’t previously checked if it had been the case. Thanks, nice illustration to include too. Certainly corroborates Z’s claims in his second letter of Aug 4th ’69 about it being ‘dark’.

And could this account for Owen not having a better description of the second car?

Looking at the layout of the road and the parking area where the murders occurred, let’s imagine you’re approaching in your vehicle. Faraday’s car was parked relatively close to the road. An oncoming car’s headlights would illuminate Faraday’s car quite brightly, if even for just a few moments until the oncoming car followed the path of LHR and veered left on toward Benicia. A second car, parked to the right of Faraday’s and nearer the gate, would not come into view of the headlights of the oncoming car, at least not as brightly, anyway. The line-of-sight of car headlights on that leftward veer would not allow for a completely illuminated view of a second car, especially if that second car was farther away from Faraday’s than the 3-4 or even 10 feet that James Owen estimated. Owen’s lack of clarity in describing the second car might be genuine. The car simply would have been out of view for the few seconds he was driving by the parking area, and since Dec. 20 was only one night after a New Moon, that second car would have been sitting in near-total blackness.

This assumes, of course, that the shooter parked to the right of Faraday’s Rambler. At BRS, Zodiac pulled in behind Ferrin’s car. Maybe this was a lesson learned at LHR. Maybe he parked too far away from Faraday’s car and made a mental note to himself not to make the same mistake again. Maybe he had a few seconds worth of trouble getting out of LHR after the bodies fell where they did, and he took all this into consideration. (All just speculation on my part…) Serial killers do improve their efficiency over time, and with practice, no? (At least up to a point of arrogance, when the pendulum begins to swing in favor of the law and the killer gets egotistically sloppy. But I digress….)

"All he said was life is bullshit, and it is, so what are you screaming about?"

 
Posted : January 9, 2014 8:44 am
(@craigfitzer)
Posts: 133
Estimable Member
Topic starter
 

I don’t see how the car could have been only 3-4 feet away from the rambler. David’s body was laying perpendicular to the rambler. How tall was he? Another car would have to have been farther away than David was tall in my opinion. Or else he would have ran over Faraday’s head backing (or pulling) out.

If you look at the original photo posted on this feed. My sons right foot is exactly 4 feet away from the vehicle. Our immediate thought was that David’s body would not have had room to lay where it was unless he fell and was leaning against Z’s vehicle. This seems a bit unlikely. We pretty much eliminated the idea that Z was parked 4 feet away – even more so if he was park 3 feet away.

On a side note but connected. I am in the process of reading Lafferty’s book "Zodiac Killer Cover up" He mentions his first encounter with his suspect as having pulled up next to him "5 inches" away. Please don’t take this as me agreeing with his suspect, just a thought.

 
Posted : January 9, 2014 11:59 pm
ace ventura
(@ace-ventura)
Posts: 435
Honorable Member
 

Pulling up 5 inches away is a commonly practiced robbery technic
you can not pull away quickly or you might hit the car and when it stops and the doors are even a gun is pointed at you .
the victim may think the person is a bad driver or knows them .
others in the lot may think it is two people who know each other talking

I have had it pulled on me
AAAAlll RRRiiightyy TTThen

 
Posted : January 10, 2014 1:12 am
(@anonymous)
Posts: 1772
Noble Member
 

There is always the possibility that more than one person arrived to kill that night.
I’m not hearing much about footprints, and there are no tire tracks. 22 degrees outside and dark.
The timeline must look something like this.
Yours leave at 11:13 kids seen alive (Yours say more like 11:20)
Hunters leave 11:14 after the Yours, no report on kids, no other car now
Zodiac comes in and kills the kids 11:15 (How many minutes does it take to discharge that many shots?)
Owens drives by, no dead bodies, but no body seen, 11:16 sees 2nd car did he miss the bodies on the ground?
Borges drives by sees dead bodies 11:17 no other car
Virtually all these people report being there at 11:15 including the Zodiac Killer.

This all seems rather impossible.

 
Posted : January 10, 2014 2:11 am
(@craigfitzer)
Posts: 133
Estimable Member
Topic starter
 

The timing is very odd.

 
Posted : January 10, 2014 2:17 am
morf13
(@morf13)
Posts: 7527
Member Admin
 

There is always the possibility that more than one person arrived to kill that night.
I’m not hearing much about footprints, and there are no tire tracks. 22 degrees outside and dark.
The timeline must look something like this.
Yours leave at 11:13 kids seen alive (Yours say more like 11:20)
Hunters leave 11:14 after the Yours, no report on kids, no other car now
Zodiac comes in and kills the kids 11:15 (How many minutes does it take to discharge that many shots?)
Owens drives by, no dead bodies, but no body seen, 11:16 sees 2nd car did he miss the bodies on the ground?
Borges drives by sees dead bodies 11:17 no other car
Virtually all these people report being there at 11:15 including the Zodiac Killer.

This all seems rather impossible.

The Yours were definitely out of there BEFORE the hunters left, and before Owen got there,their clock was several minutes fast so they were there earlier then they thought. The hunters were there aprox 5 minutes after the Yours left, then they too left the area, before Owen. Owen arrived soon after the hunters left and claims he saw a 2nd car there and no bodies…if he missed Betty’s body as close as it was to the road, he shouldnt have had a driver’s license due to poor eyesight, hard to miss her body, and Borges saw both bodies immediately.

What can we take from this? Simple- The Yours were gone by the time Zodiac parked, as were the hunters. The only person to be there at the time Zodiac was there was Owen, it’s cut & dry. You either believe his statements to police or you do not believe them. Personally, I am skeptical of him, but hey such is life ;)

There is more than one way to lose your life to a killer

http://www.zodiackillersite.com/
http://zodiackillersite.blogspot.com/
https://twitter.com/Morf13ZKS

 
Posted : January 10, 2014 2:29 am
(@craigfitzer)
Posts: 133
Estimable Member
Topic starter
 

Can I have a reminder on what direction the Borges were driving? Towards Benicia? That’s why both Bodies were in View?

 
Posted : January 10, 2014 2:55 am
Page 5 / 8
Share: