You’ve indicated that you know something that therest of us don’t. I’ve seen your posts and am wondering what they mean lol. I thought you were tied into LE and knew what VPD is up to. But now I’m not so sure. Can u tell me if your research is leading in the direction of the a car or the Santa Rosa case?

Not tied with LE nor any genealogists relevant the latter isn’t interested with my good intentions, i suspect haunting them on ged might get me tied by LE.

Regarding the direction, we start at the top, originates from california and of “high value” due to extensive work being carried out. The highlighting of Vietnam suggests the era, the pinpointing of a female suggests how close.

The speculation part, there might be a overlap between this female and the Z case, she wasn’t a victim.

Now whatever it is that i’m observing would be insanely difficult to do on the inside, To do it from a computer from the other side of the world with out any kind of hacking or illegal activity and talk with out annoying anyone here with my conjectures is another, i tread softly.

Also, theres literally no point in providing the names relevant they are only on the peripheral, My searches here has crossed paths with Soze works which again alludes to the era, place and theme and nothing more.

Can we infer from this that a suspect’s relative has submitted DNA to GEDmatch?

Don’t know curious but the oddity the overlap and where i gave up is found right there.

And just so no conclusions are jumped to, the female isn’t related to victims it isn’t darlene’s 2nd born child etc etc nothing exotic.

Don’t know curious but the oddity the overlap and where i gave up is found right there.

And just so no conclusions are jumped to, the female isn’t related to victims it isn’t darlene’s 2nd born child etc etc nothing exotic.

Darlene had one child not two, where did you come up with Darlene’s 2nd born child?

I feel it in my bones that the Zodiac’s DNA was put into GED Match long before the new policy started. ( I sure hope it was !)

Don’t know curious but the oddity the overlap and where i gave up is found right there.

And just so no conclusions are jumped to, the female isn’t related to victims it isn’t darlene’s 2nd born child etc etc nothing exotic.

Darlene had one child not two, where did you come up with Darlene’s 2nd born child?

I feel it in my bones that the Zodiac’s DNA was put into GED Match long before the new policy started. ( I sure hope it was !)

Long story, but nothing on Ged suggests that, i actually wrote a thread recently and deleted it asking what the story about that is, but it’s a rabbit hole i don’t want to place emphasis on.

Regarding Z dna fingers crossed.

Morf, have you covered this on 3 men and a mystery?

Hi Tommy,

So is it now a given that someone has isolated genuine 100% verified Zodiac DNA. Is that correct? We know that this is not another 2002 political hatchet job? Can u say how u know this? Is the source within LE or otherwise in a position to know?

Mike

Sorry for the late response as I have just come back to this thread. I was talking under the assumption that was leaked that LE did in fact extracted a DNA profile, which is apparently not true AFAWK. So my apologies for this.

Hi,

So if I go to Atlantic City this weekend, I am betting the "Still No DNA" line on the craps table.

Mike