I’m quite certain that our resident Criminal Minds fan "Russ Thompson" doesn’t know squat about Gaikowski, other than perhaps misinformation gleaned from YouTube comments and such.

Actually, no suspect has any evidence linking them to any of the crimes,
Also, name one suspect who has a strong connection to both Stine and Darlene that isn’t Gaik.

If a suspect knew two of the victims, yes that would be powerful. Gaikowski may have known them both, but he also may not have known either one.

I’m quite certain that our resident Criminal Minds fan "Russ Thompson" doesn’t know squat about Gaikowski, other than perhaps misinformation gleaned from YouTube comments and such.

Be careful what you wish for, amateur.

Ken Narlow was an idiot, huh?

A perfect example of your inanity. You call Ken Narlow a name as a joke? That is the type of person you are. I would try to hide the aspects of low character if I were you. It is very unbecoming of a human.

Criminal Minds fan "Russ Thompson"

Now that you mention it, I did hear of a felon named Tom V on Criminal Today or some such blog a little while ago…. I do watch all those things.

Ken Narlow was an idiot, huh?

A perfect example of your inanity. You call Ken Narlow a name as a joke? That is the type of person you are. I would try to hide the aspects of low character if I were you. It is very unbecoming of a human.

Let me attempt to help you understand.

Here is your quote regarding Gaikowski:
"It is all hot air. It is no coincidence that law enforcement are not at all interested in RG."

So, according to you, Ken Narlow was an idiot who got fooled by "hot air." Now, being that you know nothing about Gaikowski, as I correctly stated, you are probably still confused as to why I brought Narlow into the discussion. Well, it’s because after his initial investigation, Narlow was so high on the possibility of Gaikowski being the Zodiac, that he went out of his own jurisdiction, driving nearly two hours round trip, on his own time, after already working a full day for the Napa County Sheriff’s Department, in order to put Gaikowski under surveillance. And it only ended after Gaikowski was tipped off to Narlow’s activity.

But it must have been because Narlow was an idiot who got fooled by "hot air."

Criminal Minds fan "Russ Thompson"

Now that you mention it, I did hear of a felon named Tom V on Criminal Today or some such blog a little while ago…. I do watch all those things.

You should stop wasting your time on fake news and start focusing on learning about the Zodiac case. Your posts are hot garbage. Also, I found several pedophiles named "Russ Thompson." Should I imply you are one of them?

Criminal Minds fan "Russ Thompson"

Now that you mention it, I did hear of a felon named Tom V on Criminal Today or some such blog a little while ago…. I do watch all those things.

You should stop wasting your time on fake news and start focusing on learning about the Zodiac case. Your posts are hot garbage. Also, I found several pedophiles named "Russ Thompson." Should I imply you are one of them?

I bet a casual search of a sex offender registry will turn up a few Tom Voigts, too. Your point is?

I bet a casual search of a sex offender registry will turn up a few Tom Voigts, too. Your point is?

You need to ask what my point is? Even after you just made it for me?

Ken Narlow was an idiot, huh?

A perfect example of your inanity. You call Ken Narlow a name as a joke? That is the type of person you are. I would try to hide the aspects of low character if I were you. It is very unbecoming of a human.

Let me attempt to help you understand.

Here is your quote regarding Gaikowski:
"It is all hot air. It is no coincidence that law enforcement are not at all interested in RG."

So, according to you, Ken Narlow was an idiot who got fooled by "hot air." Now, being that you know nothing about Gaikowski, as I correctly stated, you are probably still confused as to why I brought Narlow into the discussion. Well, it’s because after his initial investigation, Narlow was so high on the possibility of Gaikowski being the Zodiac, that he went out of his own jurisdiction, driving nearly two hours round trip, on his own time, after already working a full day for the Napa County Sheriff’s Department, in order to put Gaikowski under surveillance. And it only ended after Gaikowski was tipped off to Narlow’s activity.

But it must have been because Narlow was an idiot who got fooled by "hot air."

But, did Narlow actually think Gaikowski was Zodiac? He acted on a tip, which is reasonable. The question remains, if Narlow was so high on Gaikowski as Zodiac, why didn’t he continue to follow up? Use another person to surveil him? From the late 80s to his death in 2004, no one cared about Gaik. So, was he really a great suspect? If Gaik is Z, and Z started his murders with Bates, he started at 30. That’s late for a serial killer to start killing. Then, he just stops after a few years? I am skeptical.

Narlow practiced due diligence like anyone should expect.
But here in this thread Narlow becomes a character in Tom’s narrative, so Narlow, who being deceased cannot protect his name from Tom, is now the Gaik champion… I am familiar with how this goes for charlatans trying to profit off of blood.

I bet a casual search of a sex offender registry will turn up a few Tom Voigts, too. Your point is?

You need to ask what my point is? Even after you just made it for me?

Well, the point was more to illustrate that childish BS doesn’t get us anywhere. We’re all capable of insulting each other, but that is not the point of the blog.

did Narlow actually think Gaikowski was Zodiac?

He followed the evidence and it lead him to Gaikowski’s house. He also worked hard enough and long enough to place Gaikowski inside Darlene’s house back in 1969. I doubt he did those things because he thought Gaikowski was not viable as Zodiac.

So nobody knows when Zodiac began killing, but Gaikowski doesn’t fit because he was 29 in 1966? Even though we don’t know when Zodiac began killing? That makes zero sense.

so Narlow, who being deceased cannot protect his name from Tom

Too bad for "Russ Thompson" that these details came from Narlow himself. You see, some of us actually knew him. (That’s because some of us have been doing this longer than since they heard the Monster podcast.) But hey, if you want to call Ken Narlow a liar, have at it!

The bottom pic is from when I arranged for Narlow to meet William Baker to discuss their similar cases, Berryessa and Domingos/Edwards.