Never mind, I found it, H is for householder, not renter. So does the plot thicken? Or was it a typo?

Edit: looked at criss cross-

Who is Ronne? Family?

-m

Since 2361 & 2361a both have last name, Bartlett, could it be that a Relative owned the home and it was a duplex?

They also had same phone number.

I checked Ancestry and there is no such person as Ronne Bartlett. I think it may be a typo.

I checked Ancestry and there is no such person as Ronne Bartlett. I think it may be a typo.

A typo?

If Bonnie moved to Canada in the late 60s, why is there still a B Bartlett in the 1972 directory?

http://www.sfgenealogy.com/san_francisc … 72_351.pdf

(I’m just assuming B Bartlett is Bonnie; could it be a relative?)

From 1969 directory: Is this a different Tim Sullivan (at 25 Baker St, Apt 2)?

http://www.sfgenealogy.com/san_francisc … 9_1954.pdf

From 1968 directory, here’s Bonnie and that Kenneth Vazeau fella again:

http://www.sfgenealogy.com/san_francisc … 8_2095.pdf

If Bonnie moved to Canada in the late 60s, why is there still a B Bartlett in the 1972 directory?

http://www.sfgenealogy.com/san_francisc … 72_351.pdf

(I’m just assuming B Bartlett is Bonnie; could it be a relative?)

I’m not to sure what to think about that. Since B Bartlett is at the same Jackson St. address I think we can be safe in assuming that the B stands for Bonnie. I suppose it’s possible that there were two different Bonnie Bartlett’s in SF at the same time. It’s not a terribly unusual name. We do know that the 1370 California Apt. 206 is on her marriage license so maybe that’s the address we should concentrate on?????

"Bonnie" and "Ronne" Bartlett are again listed as two separate people in the 1967 directory:

http://www.sfgenealogy.com/san_francisc … 67_289.pdf

I’m not to sure what to think about that. Since B Bartlett is at the same Jackson St. address I think we can be safe in assuming that the B stands for Bonnie. I suppose it’s possible that there were two different Bonnie Bartlett’s in SF at the same time. It’s not a terribly unusual name. We do know that the 1370 California Apt. 206 is on her marriage license so maybe that’s the address we should concentrate on?????

Good point. Could very well be a different Bonnie Bartlett.

From 1969 directory: Is this a different Tim Sullivan (at 25 Baker St, Apt 2)?

http://www.sfgenealogy.com/san_francisc … 9_1954.pdf

Tim was a hippie. This was in Haight-Ashbury. If our Tim, this could put Ross in San Fran in 1969.

if i’m not mistaken, someone on this site stated a few weeks back
that Tim and Bonnie were divorced by 1969?

if i’m not mistaken, someone on this site stated a few weeks back
that Tim and Bonnie were divorced by 1969?

Not sure if they were or not. If they were, then it would be interesting, because a Bonnie L. Bartlett got married in Contra Costa County in June,1969.L was ‘our’ Bonnie’s middle initial

Also, regarding the Bonnie Bartlett who lived in SF, there is another possible Bonnie, a Woman named Bonnie C. Bartlett who lived in San Fran in 1980. She is now 70 yrs old.

As far as I know we do not have a firm date of when Tim Sullivan went to Canada to avoid being drafted but I think I may have narrowed down when that could have happened.

In December of 1969 the first "Draft Lottery" was conducted to determine the order in which men would be called in the year of 1970 to go in for their selective service physical. The physical would determine if that person was fit for military duty. If he was fit and had no other exemptions he would be drafted fairly quickly. The lottery used a man’s birthdate to assign the order in which he would be called in for the physical. All men who were born between 1944 and 1950 were included in this first lottery.

The Wiki on the draft lottery-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_lottery_(1969 )

We now know that Tim Sullivan’s birthdate was September 7, 1946. According to the chart made for this first lottery Tim’s number was 8, a very, very low number which would have insured that he would be drafted.

I believe that the lottery and the low number that Tim was assigned was the catalyst for Tim’s move to Canada and that it was after the numbers were drawn that Tim went to Canada.

Here is the chart for the numbers that each birthdate was assigned from this website-

http://www.historynet.com/whats-your-number.htm

As far as I know we do not have a firm date of when Tim Sullivan went to Canada to avoid being drafted but I think I may have narrowed down when that could have happened.

In December of 1969 the first "Draft Lottery" was conducted to determine the order in which men would be called in the year of 1970 to go in for their selective service physical. The physical would determine if that person was fit for military duty. If he was fit and had no other exemptions he would be drafted fairly quickly. The lottery used a man’s birthdate to assign the order in which he would be called in for the physical. All men who were born between 1944 and 1950 were included in this first lottery.

The Wiki on the draft lottery-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_lottery_(1969 )

We now know that Tim Sullivan’s birthdate was September 7, 1946. According to the chart made for this first lottery Tim’s number was 8, a very, very low number which would have insured that he would be drafted.

I believe that the lottery and the low number that Tim was assigned was the catalyst for Tim’s move to Canada and that it was after the numbers were drawn that Tim went to Canada.

Here is the chart for the numbers that each birthdate was assigned from this website-

http://www.historynet.com/whats-your-number.htm

Great work seagull. I was wondering this myself. So this means that Timothy likely lived in San Francisco until then? But if he and Bonnie lived in Canada together, and we have three sources that they did, how would they have moved to Canada in 1969 if they were divorced by 1969?

It’s possible that Timothy and Bonnie moved to Canada, split up and he returned to the states (didn’t they have a baby together?). Then when his draft number was called up he moved back to Canada and applied for landed residency in 1969-70.

I, too, am trying to reconcile this whole situation. The last name of Sullivan is common, Timothy has been a common name for eons as it’s a biblical name. Bonnie is less common but it was fairly common for women in her age group. I think what I will do on Tuesday is send for the 1969 marriage certificate for Bonnie L Bartlett and see if she is the correct one. I don’t see any other options to be positive about this.