Zodiac Discussion Forum

2015 cipher challen…
 
Notifications
Clear all

2015 cipher challenge

18 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
3,449 Views
Jarlve
(@jarlve)
Posts: 2547
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

Hello everyone,

A cipher challenge fit to a scheme and rules sound like a great idea to me. The main objective is to become smarter about the specific scheme, to learn and possibly develop new systems to expose weaknesses, that in turn could have a carry over to the 340.

Let’s say the schemes are "transposition, homophonic substitution" and the rules are:

– 340 symbols in a 17×20 grid, 63 unique symbols.
– These schemes must be used only, no double encyption etc.
– Plaintext is of english language, lower case, and read from left-to-right, top-to-bottom before transposition.
– Plaintext must be recoverable with ZKDecrypto after undoing the transposition scheme.
– Plaintext must be unrecoverable with ZKDecrypto before undoing the transposition scheme.
– Make a note when your cipher needs other than standard ZKDecrypto settings to be solved, for example IOC: 3.
– Transposition may be done before and/or after the homophonic substitution.
– The transposition scheme must follow a certain logic, obviously transpositioning all 340 symbols to random positions is unrecoverable.
– You may not give tips and hints, the cipher stands until it is broken.
– You may only submit one cipher at a time, and may submit a new one if your current one is solved.
– You do not have to mimic strange behaviour seen in the Zodiac 340.
– You do not try to play around the rules somehow.
– You do not use a plaintext from my library, or an existing plaintext of any cipher that you are aware of.
– Preferably you create an easy cipher to start with and then make a more difficult one after it is solved.
– You give a rating as how hard you think your cipher is: EASY, MEDIUM, HARD.
– Multiple transposition may be layered but be sure to rate the difficulty of your cipher accordingly.

I’d like to know who would be interested, in creating such a cipher and/or trying to solve these.

Here is a homophonic substitution generator: http://code.google.com/p/zkdecrypto/downloads/list

AZdecrypt

 
Posted : January 3, 2015 5:38 pm
glurk
(@glurk)
Posts: 756
Prominent Member
 

Give me about 20 or 30 minutes and I will create one of these for you.

-glurk

EDIT: Here is my "challenge" and I would have to call it easy. It is a text of my own writing, with a simple transposition, and homophonically encoded.

  35   4  37  24  37  38  43  52   3  61  49   1  54   8  48  57  13
  10  39  44  19  44  23  61  22  62  20  12  17  18  35  36  28   1
  23  48  21  11  33  48  26  24  29  63  55  11  16   5  60   9   1
   8   4  12  56  61  28  48  51  39  38  12  52  20  53  47  27  31
  32  18   6  21  60  20  30   5  59  55  11  16  61  47  46   5   6
  59  29  11  13  56  17  26  10  53  46  28   5  47  20   5  50  15
  11  33  11  26  23  23  47  26  10  32  60  58  24  37   5  25  30
  29   9  46  27  58  54  59  47  29  13   6  33  43  42  21  47  28
  39  51  62  37  13  21  63  42  13  29  15   8  38  20  10  32  27
  36  25  46  12  57  28  57  28  31  58  51  59  51   8  61  20  15
  25   9  36  23  63  42  54   7  28  10  27  36   3  22  33  56   2
  46   9  30   9   4  34  39  12  10  62  12   6  38  47  41  49  17
  49  53  22  10  39  40  61  63  20  49  59  11  61  13   6  36  59
  11  53  60  49  59  25  32   7  50  42  25  29  44  47  17  18  15
  32  15  56   7  37  62  24  56  55  46   9  20  47  55  18  25  10
  45  25   9  36  26  17  56  15  33  27  58  22   6   4  28  49  39
  14  37  45  42  58   4  63  55  51  20  62  51  12  53  49   2   8
  39  26   6   7  28  49   8  37  14  45  42  32  11  33   9   9  41
  10  62  42  44   7  30  21  56  33  54  54  39  43  20  33  26  27
  21  27   6  42  33  25  25  32  44   4  28  35  56  12  11  49  56

——————————–
I don’t believe in monsters.

 
Posted : January 3, 2015 6:05 pm
Jarlve
(@jarlve)
Posts: 2547
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks for your entry glurk!

Here is my entry. Not sure about the difficulty, probably easy to medium.

16AO-1=+Y<T=&P>HT
(yVG<=@vlZ>^T6Z1{
,H<%F^%<G>0<O/w}
J.O@Y?S5DGJ;BB44
FO=FY<G_&&ZI]{lo
}OTf>hMJ–BD&+JHw
‘HVZ,I,n1}~ZCYVKQ
nO’YT?H'(M%f>4ARS
h1IQIwZw^.}J=S,?y
Nh*-QKSP+%%F5GQv
P~"Dw45BkOhJIRH_B
6B<h?f’}~0(M1,+AZ
K@_.VG"6]Ek<5E-C<
O"YNQv0RPnZ}f*K0A
{yvY6A%"~]yRC"A,E
0I@,5,^N.f@j+<,RN
5S_4VBM=_M",6HGl’
‘O)n<yv_R-,kBVDw+
TB>H?%FOy,w6VEDY
T4EkC5KD0I~f"QWJB

AZdecrypt

 
Posted : January 3, 2015 8:36 pm
 _pi
(@_pi)
Posts: 113
Estimable Member
 

Good idea!

glurk’s is gibberish…

_pi

 
Posted : January 3, 2015 11:59 pm
Jarlve
(@jarlve)
Posts: 2547
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

_pi, would you like to create a cipher to these rules?

AZdecrypt

 
Posted : January 4, 2015 9:34 pm
glurk
(@glurk)
Posts: 756
Prominent Member
 

Jarlve has asked me to create another one of these, so I have done so. I was going for "medium" difficulty on this one, but it might be more like "easy."
I could make it much harder, but I don’t think doing that would be much help. In any case, I have no problem with making these, it’s pretty simple.
A PM or message from anyone who solves it would be appreciated. As per "the rules" I am giving no hints or anything.

  29  41  47  51   5  16   3  62  41  27  14  13  44  17  16  39  13
  40  40  44  42  14   8  21   6  38  32  18  61  56  29   4  30  50
  10  14  13  17  33   6  44  19  20  51  16  49  32  40  44  50   6
  33  55  26  38  51  21  35  27  58   1  21  37  34  16  39   2  51
  40  51  43   3  55  52  24   5  55  51  45  30   7  55  23  26  39
  30  27  36   5  41  36  60  39  47  25  31  55  63  24  28  33  18
  19  28   2  19  13   4  15   7  60  20  38  46  25  20  25   6  38
  31  22   3  45  56  42  58  43  17  38  51  59  37  30   7  56  31
  47  31  51   2   1   1  58   8  29   9  47   7  58   5   9  53  44
  55  57  30  50  12  24  54  25  39  34  48  27  50  54  50  11   5
  61  16  21  60  57  50   1  37  24  10  62  34  31   1  30  32  10
  51  30  25  34  23  45  13  29  54  51   6   9  29  33  37   8  25
   4   2  43   2  45  39  61  55  52  38  18  26  30  21  55  13  26
  11  36  15  39  56  10   9   5  39  56   5  35  27  36   4  13  36
  36  44  17  38   1  24  54  12  58  22  27  31  20  45  50  24  26
  61  47  10  49  56  21  10  31  61  14  61  33   2  27   8  50  28
   6  54  25   1   8  28   1  61  43  20  60  11  31  36  20  14  33
  60  43   8  59  61  56  19  13  12  59  22  61  25  13  46  58   5
  54  16  30  14  55  26   8  31  28  58  60  20  27  23  14  55   7
  30  43  41  14   2  12   7   6  13   4  16  21  15  45  50  19  31
  30  35  45  44  21  29   8  28  62   1  48  23  13  12  27   5  26

NOTE: I like to post these as numeric ciphers, because message boards can mess up ASCII text sometimes.

——————————–
I don’t believe in monsters.

 
Posted : January 5, 2015 7:42 pm
glurk
(@glurk)
Posts: 756
Prominent Member
 

A challenge cipher has been posted on Tom Voigt’s board here:

http://zodiackiller.fr.yuku.com/topic/7 … -Challenge

The OP says "I don’t know if this will be easy or hard. May take 2 hours, 2 days, 2 weeks?"
He is apparently unaware of the programs that are out there.

-glurk

——————————–
I don’t believe in monsters.

 
Posted : July 29, 2015 10:35 am
traveller1st
(@traveller1st)
Posts: 3583
Member Moderator
 

A challenge cipher has been posted on Tom Voigt’s board here:

http://zodiackiller.fr.yuku.com/topic/7 … -Challenge

The OP says "I don’t know if this will be easy or hard. May take 2 hours, 2 days, 2 weeks?"
He is apparently unaware of the programs that are out there.

-glurk

Done. AFAICT

Took about 5 or 6 mins. That’s no achievement on my part though. I had some ‘eople’ help?. ;)

Note to members – SAME RULES – Please don’t post the results here either. That wouldn’t be fair or nice.


I don’t know Chief, he’s very smart or very dumb.

 
Posted : July 29, 2015 11:35 am
glurk
(@glurk)
Posts: 756
Prominent Member
 

Trav-

I agree 100%, the OP asked that no one reveal the solution, and there is no point in doing so here.

That said, creating a homophonic cipher of this type is NEVER an easy task, and I’d happily welcome him to join here. But I want the board to be swimming with cryptographers. It’s like swimming with sharks, but safer. :lol:

-glurk

——————————–
I don’t believe in monsters.

 
Posted : July 29, 2015 12:16 pm
traveller1st
(@traveller1st)
Posts: 3583
Member Moderator
 

It’s like swimming with sharks, but safer. :lol:

-glurk

Hmmmmm. IYO … :P

and if you have the right equipment to handle them and if the water hasn’t been chummed. ;) :lol:


I don’t know Chief, he’s very smart or very dumb.

 
Posted : July 29, 2015 12:30 pm
Jarlve
(@jarlve)
Posts: 2547
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

Can someone invite this guy over? He’s been working on the ciphers since 2007.

– I thought yesterday about changing the rules of this challenge a bit. And I also want to note that my challenge cipher has remain unsolved.

AZdecrypt

 
Posted : July 29, 2015 12:43 pm
daikon
(@daikon)
Posts: 179
Estimable Member
 

The OP says "I don’t know if this will be easy or hard. May take 2 hours, 2 days, 2 weeks?"
He is apparently unaware of the programs that are out there.

Also, when you are trying to construct a hard cipher, try not to use plaintext that will likely appear in the N-gram corpus if not in its entirety, but definitely in parts. 🙂

The impressive thing about this cipher though, is that the author managed to mimic Z340 pretty closely. Even secondary stats, such as bigram repeats, are very similar.

 
Posted : July 30, 2015 3:52 am
daikon
(@daikon)
Posts: 179
Estimable Member
 

– I thought yesterday about changing the rules of this challenge a bit. And I also want to note that my challenge cipher has remain unsolved.

Ok, I’ll bite. Looking at your cipher, you have a distinct spike in the bigram repeats at period 2, which suggests either a columnar transposition over a matrix of 2 by 170 (or 170 by 2), or you simply swapped the pairs of neighboring letters. The low number of repeats in the last 3 rows suggests that perhaps it was either encoded backwards (i.e. right-to-left, bottom-to-top), or you reversed the whole cipher (so the plaintext should be read backwards). Aha! "The Mummy Case" has been solved. 🙂 I won’t reveal the actual plaintext in case someone else wants to solve it.

 
Posted : July 30, 2015 8:00 am
daikon
(@daikon)
Posts: 179
Estimable Member
 

EDIT: Here is my "challenge" and I would have to call it easy. It is a text of my own writing, with a simple transposition, and homophonically encoded.

Your first cipher in this thread has pretty high bigram repeats, so before I tried guessing the transposition, I simply tried solving it as is, and I got a pretty legible text. As far as I can tell you just shifted each row to the left by one letter, correct?

 
Posted : July 30, 2015 8:13 am
daikon
(@daikon)
Posts: 179
Estimable Member
 

Jarlve has asked me to create another one of these, so I have done so.

This one also has good number of bigram repeats, which suggests that the transposition wasn’t too granular (unlike Jarlve’s cipher in this thread). I also noticed that the last rows had distinctly lower number of repeats, which suggests that the cipher was encoded backwards, or that the plaintext should be read backwards. Then I tried feeding your cipher as-is into my solver, and I saw that it was being repeatedly solved to a seemingly random gibberish. But when I looked closer, I saw fragments of words and even a couple of whole words, and then I recognized the text. 🙂 It wasn’t too difficult to figure out the transposition scheme after that (I’ll just mention numbers 10 and 7).

Comparing the ciphers in this thread to Z340, I have to say that none of the 3 felt to me to be particularly close to Z340. Two glurk’s were close to it in bigram repeats, but both get a stable solve, from which you can figure out the transposition. Z340 obviously doesn’t get stable solves. Jarlve’s bigram repeats were quite a bit lower than Z340’s, and it had a distinct spike in a transposition test, again unlike Z340. Jarlve’s bigram IoC (1.377) was actually closer to a non-transposed random plaintext (0.992) than Z340’s (1.997).

P.S. I just realized that maybe I wasn’t supposed to post so many hints here, in the thread? Let me know, and I’ll edit the posts.

 
Posted : July 30, 2015 8:51 am
Page 1 / 2
Share: