Zodiac Discussion Forum

The Eerie Behemoth …
 
Notifications
Clear all

The Eerie Behemoth Hypothesis

6 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
1,642 Views
 _pi
(@_pi)
Posts: 113
Estimable Member
Topic starter
 

Here’s a new hypothesis I am proposing: the zodiac wrote the last 18 characters of the z408 as a clue on the nature of the z340 he would send out 3 months later.

By slightly shuffling EBEORIETEMETHHPITI without adding, replacing or removing any letters, we can obtain a meaningful and error-free 3-word phrase. Only 5 letters have to be moved to obtain that phrase, which means that 13 of the 18 letters are actually already in the proper sequence. Here is that phrase:

EERIEBEHEMOTHPITTI or, with spaces: EERIE BEHEMOTH PITTI

The following diagram illustrates how this phrase can be scrambled to obtain the original EBEORIETEMETHHPITI by moving only 5 letters:

Here is another diagram that helps visualize how this phrase is so similar to the original 18 letters. 13 characters (shown in black) remain in exactly the same order; only 5 characters (shown in green) are shuffled around:

Now, what is a pitti?? Here is what I think this complete phrase could refer to:

The Palazzo Pitti, in English sometimes called the Pitti Palace, is a vast mainly Renaissance palace in Florence, Italy. It is situated on the south side of the River Arno, a short distance from the Ponte Vecchio. The core of the present palazzo dates from 1458 and was originally the town residence of Luca Pitti, an ambitious Florentine banker.
[…]
In the late 18th century, the palazzo was used as a power base by Napoleon, and later served for a brief period as the principal royal palace of the newly united Italy.

Here are some pertinent descriptions of the Pitti palace from books that would have been available at the time the z408 was written:

…severe and forbidding building…

The rusticated stonework gives the palazzo a severe and powerful atmosphere…

Here are definitions of some key words mentioned above:
eerie: Strange and frightening, mysterious
behemoth: Something enormous in size or power
forbidding: Unfriendly or threatening in appearance

Given these definitions, "eerie behemoth" can be an apt description of the Pitti palace.

This is all well and good but how can this possibly relate to the z340?

Some have hypothesized the zodiac found inspiration in the book The Codebreakers – The Story of Secret Writing, by David Kahn, to create his ciphers. In this book, there is a long section about Leon Battista Alberti. Here are some interesting excerpts:

…Alberti, a man who, perhaps better than anyone except Leonardo da Vinci, epitomizes the Renaissance ideal of the universal man.

Alberti’s three remarkable firsts – the earliest Western exposition of cryptanalysis, the invention of polyalphabetic substitution, and the invention of enciphered code – make him the Father of Western Cryptology.

And then, there is this:

As an architect, he completed the Pitti Palace…

In short, the architect who worked on the Pitti Palace is also the inventor of the polyalphabetic substitution. Hence, the hypothesis is that the z408 contains an indirect reference to polyalphabetic ciphers, presumably a hint regarding the nature of the z340.

Alberti’s polyalphabetic invention consists in a wheel with 2 concentric discs. The outer disc contains the plaintext letters, and the inner disc contains the cipher letters. The cipher is written in lower-case letters. Each time the cipher author chooses to change the alphabet (i.e. rotating the inner disc) he will write a letter in upper-case to indicate that the alphabet has now shifted (using the upper-case letter as the new reference point).

I think this basic principle could have been used in the z340. For example, the "+" symbol might be used to indicate a shift in the alphabet. The added complexity in the z340 is that if it is a polyalphabetic cipher, it would be homophonic as well.

An interesting coincidence is that Alberti’s concentric discs are split in 24 segments which means that 24 alphabets can be used in his system. The z340 has 24 "+" symbols meaning that if "+" was an alphabet-switching indicator, 24 alphabets could have been used (since the last "+" is at the very end of the cipher).

There is another amusing coincidence. Alberti’s system uses enciphered codes, numbers written in the plaintext. These numbers are indexes in a dictionary of pre-defined words where each word is associated to a number. Since Alberti’s system only allows the digits 1 to 4 and a maximum of 4 digits per number, the theoretical maximum number of entries in that dictionary is:

However, according to the book, Alberti used a minimum of 2 digits per number so the actual limit would have been 336.

If the zodiac did consult The Codebreakers book, he wouldn’t have had to look too far to find a reference to Alberti’s polyalphabetic system. Alberti’s polyalphabetic cipher disk is printed right on the title page of the book, just after the front page.

A final note regarding the last 18 symbols of the z408. While it is of course possible that it is only filler, I have some doubts about that.

I find the "pull-down" theory very compelling, but I don’t subscribe to its final conclusion. This theory demonstrates that it is statistically unlikely to be a coincidence that so many symbols in the last line of the z408 are "pulled down" from another line of the cryptogram, especially considering that a whole tetragram is copied in that manner. While this theory shows the author of the cipher likely grabbed parts of the z408 to construct the last line, to me, it does not demonstrate that the intent was to create filler.

The z408’s last line exhibits other statistical properties that make it quite unique:

  • 82% of the symbols on the z408’s last line are composed of repeating n-grams. That’s 14 symbols, compared to an average of 7.1 symbols per line in all the other 23 lines.[/*:m:2fw4gw4x]
  • The last line has the highest repeating n-gram count.[/*:m:2fw4gw4x]
  • The last line has 4 repeating n-grams longer than 2. The average of other lines is 0.9.[/*:m:2fw4gw4x]
  • The last line has 0 symbols of frequency 6 or lower. The average of all other lines is 4.4.[/*:m:2fw4gw4x][/list:u:2fw4gw4x]
  • What this tells me is that there probably was an intent to make the last line very stable by not using low frequency symbols and by re-using so many portions of the cipher. If the last 18 character segment is indeed meaningful but is further scrambled or enciphered, it becomes necessary to ensure its stability by using means other than relying on its underlying plaintext intrinsic textual structure to guarantee a proper intermediary decipherment which can then be used for a secondary decipherment.

    _pi

     
Posted : November 3, 2013 11:40 am
(@anonymous)
Posts: 1772
Noble Member
 

Hi _pi,

I find this hypothesis intriguing because of the tie-in to The Codebreakers book. The chain of reasoning linking the code to the book, thence to Alberti, and from there to the Palazzo Pitti, seems very plausible.

But of the 18 characters, only 5 (P,I,T,T,I) would concretely refer to anything. While the remaining 18 letters can be seen as two possible words that can be construed to have meaning (Eerie Behemoth), they would seem to be only slightly more meaningful than filler. If I might be allowed to coin the notion of an "indicativeness to non-indicativeness" ratio–that would give us a ratio of 5:13, which intuitively seems low. Not sure this is a valid measure of anything, other than my intuitions.

Still, If the phrase "Eerie Behemoth Pitti" showed up as a clue on a "Cryptic Crossword", I would imagine it would be possible to solve it as referring to Palazzo Pitti. I am not sure if Cryptic Crosswords are popular in your neck of the woods–they are a crossword with very perverse mind-twisting clues that are created by what I can only imagine are diabolically demented puzzle-smiths. I don’t usually spend a lot of time on them, but usually feel proud of myself when I can solve even half the clues. I bring these up, because it occurred to me some time ago that Z’s "clews" might have been partially inspired by Cryptic Crosswords.

So, in the end, I see pros and cons to this hypothesis and I would definitely consider it a possibility. If it should turn out to be wrong, as most theories will, it still has an nicely reasoned tie-in. Excellent work, as always.

Regards,

G

 
Posted : November 4, 2013 12:41 am
glurk
(@glurk)
Posts: 756
Prominent Member
 

The only thing I have to leave here is this nasty buton.

-glurk

( _pi, I usually like your work. This hypothesis, umm, not so much. )

——————————–
I don’t believe in monsters.

 
Posted : November 5, 2013 4:46 pm
AK Wilks
(@ak-wilks)
Posts: 1407
Noble Member
 

"Eerie Behemoth" to me suggests a Loch Ness Monster or a Yeti.

MODERATOR

 
Posted : November 7, 2013 1:40 am
(@anonymous)
Posts: 1772
Noble Member
 

"Eerie Behemoth" to me suggests a Loch Ness Monster or a Yeti.

How about an elephant?

(They have much bigger ears.)

 
Posted : November 8, 2013 6:11 pm
doranchak
(@doranchak)
Posts: 2614
Member Admin
 

I still like these anagrams of the last 18 (just for their "fun" factor):

– I’m here to bit the pie.
– The eerie poet bit him.
– Hi! I time the beer poet.

Although their "edit distances" from the original 18 are probably large.

I am interested in your general idea of minimizing anagramming steps, in the sense that it provides a challenging constraint for finding anagrams. And I’m wondering how many such anagrams are only a few steps away from the original arrangement of letters.

On top of this, however, is the following problem: If Zodiac meant for the last 18 to be anagrammed, then he did something quite remarkable by preserving the pulled-down symbols from the above ciphertext, all while preserving the plaintext-to-cipher mappings among the 18 extra characters.

It’s a possibility, but it seems too difficult to pull off. Someone would need to simulate the process to see how messages could be encoded in this way (without breaking the apparent regularity of the pulled-down cipher symbols).

http://zodiackillerciphers.com

 
Posted : November 10, 2013 5:49 pm
Share: