I solved it in December 2025 and have been waiting around ever since to hear back anything about it.  

The only reason I really cared about experts looking at it, was I figured if someone endorsed it, the triangle would be scanned.  Yes this would also mean I solved the cipher.  And you don’t want to incorrectly say someone solved it, when they did not.

But I did.  When/if it is scanned that will be my proof.  I don’t even know if that will ever happen.  It keeps me up at night.  Something that the reader wouldn’t understand, as they likely believe the landmark is natural in origin.  That’s fine.

And to any experts that I did contact early on, I will give you the benefit of the doubt and just assume you receive too many Z32 solutions.  Most are bad, and a waste of time to review.  I agree with that.

However if you had believed it was correct, or at least worth the scan I suggest (it is), and were able to move this along quicker, I would have given you massive credit for helping it get done.  Instead I had to go through Zodiac forums, which sucked.

I think the work is a bit too sophisticated for Zodiac internet forums.  I don’t mean to be rude, I say that honestly.  I think much of it is going over people’s heads, but I stand by the method and code.

And so I will say it one more time:

IN THREE AND THREE EIGHTHS RADIANS TEN is the solution to Z32. Discovered by David Stampher in December 2025, who found the triangle landmark by Lake Herman Road, solving the cipher after 55 years.

Adding more.

Will keep going, as previously stated.

Still awaiting experts to falsify the work.  Or not.

This is just to show that I have been asking for that for awhile.  But objections must be unbiased.  I just have to mention this because all of the objections I have received so far have all been entirely based on subjective beliefs.  Here they are, over the past month.  This has been sent to multiple independent individuals with the capable to evaluate the work.

1.  “Not a CSP, so everything is wrong”.  -Reddit user that claims to have a PHD.

Yes it is.

2.  “Zodiac couldn’t have made that, because it would require heavy machinery, too hard.” -CS Professor that didn’t find any problems with the code/method.  Besides this part, they gave positive feedback, although minimal and vague.

3.  “Natural origin on landmark, so proposed solution is wrong.” -Zodiac internet forum user.

4.  “Watering hole is the intended purpose of the landmark.  Sorry, but your work is wrong for this reason.”. -Zodiac internet forum user.

And that is all I have heard as far as objections go.

Besides that, my work was also censored by an authoritarian forum administrator, that has been following the case for 30 years.

Despite those 30 years, this person can’t seem to figure out that Zodiac made that landmark.  And so, he censored it so that the users of his forums could not discuss the work further.

It’s not over until it is over, I am still here and not going away.  The work will continue.  The roadblocks and silence started weighing on me, throwing off my focus and sleep waiting around.  But all I need is a bit of rest and I will be right back to where I was in the beginning.

Also, just wanted to mention again I bought the domain INTHREEANDTHREEEIGHTHSRADIANSTEN.com

I will get that site live ASAP.  I own this solution.  I found it, David Stampher, back in December 2025 and submitted my tip to the authorities as I mentioned in my first post.  While I have been met with a lot of silence, I know what I have is special.  I think people will realize that one day.  I will make sure they do.  And they will know I did it, and what I had to push through to get the word out.

It will be weird to talk about how suppressed/ignored this was early on, if it checks out.  I still don’t know exactly what that was all about, except most were distracted by the Black Dahlia rumor, which became popular the very day after I shared what I found.  The other forum admin made a big click bait post about Dahlia with an all caps and mostly bumped that thread the entire time I was on their forums, never engaging with this landmark.  He could have debunked the work if he had a problem with it.  

He created a fairly nasty situation with that.  Had his censorship been warranted, that is a different story.  It wasn’t, and he knows that.

And this censorship from this other forum administrator is very much why I am now here.  But these forums are dormant.  Reddit is not a good option for this work, they will not know what a CSP is.  And if they don’t understand the method, they will just say it is wrong.  I don’t want to argue with Reddit users, or Zodiac internet forum users.  I need to be speaking with serious individuals about this that don’t play games.  The bit of feedback I have received, from qualified individuals, is appreciated but always short and vague.  There has not been in depth engagement, to my knowledge, by any of the qualified people I have contacted.  But I do know they have checked the code and math for correctness, which has held up.

My problem here is that they don’t seem to be taking the landmark very seriously.

Or they are taking it seriously, but not engaging with the person who found it.  Not sure why that would be, I put my email in the paper for a reason.

It is confusing to me, because I am wondering their explanation of the landmark, if they don’t think Zodiac made it.  Hard to say what many of them think, they just haven’t provided the useful feedback to me.

The entire reason of putting it all out there was to receive feedback, not silence.  I wanted to make the work even better, which is hard to do when people do not reach and talk about it.

So yes I am still not feeling so great about the experts for this reason.  Being open, I must say this.  

It is nothing personal, but rather a matter of professionalism and seriousness, which go hand in hand.

A certain amount of waiting is completely understandable.  It is only after around 3 months that it seems the work has just been ignored.  But not getting the feedback, I do not know the reason for that.

So this is my reason for stating my displeasure regarding the experts.  The feedback would have been extremely valuable to me in the early days.  People are busy, they have other things they need to do.  I remind myself of this.

Still, I believe this is important enough to keep coming here every day.

The lack of feedback left me stumbling around in the dark.  I am pretty sure I headed in the right direction.  The purpose of putting it out there is so others can tell me if I did or not.  No one has (provably) said that I didn’t in four months.

Which is what has led me to just begin saying I have solved it.  There is enough evidence for me to do that.  If experts disagree, please say so.

The scan is the critical test, but there really aren’t any good explanations for the landmark, which was made by a human.  And I know which human did that.  Smart people will realize this (I think and hope).  It is a matter of probability.