Hi-

I just read something from 2015 where Stewart was whining about how right after his book came out some vicious Zodiac researchers trashed his handwriting evidence but that what we did not know is that there is more handwriting in his possession from EVB that also matches Z’s. If so, why did Wakshull call me in August 2014 and say that he was wrong about the handwriting? Did Stewart keep this other writing from his expert for some reason?

He also whined about the fact that we are ignoring the fingerprint evidence. That is because it is also bogus. There is never any reason to make a mirror image of a fingerprint in order to make it match. The only reason you make a mirror image copy is if the print does not match any other way!

"That is when I went back to that box of evidence and began searching through every piece of paper I had, and stumbled upon 5 exemplars, one being the now ‘infamous’ marriage certificate between my mother and my father. I knew by looking at every one of those exemplars that my father’s handwriting looked exactly like the handwriting in the Zodiac letters, but I am not trained in that field. My co-author took information to Michael Wakshull, who came to his conclusion…based on each of those exemplars he was given, not the marriage certificate alone, but the entirety. The most important thing about the Zodiac case is it will never be solved based upon handwriting. Period. So many people have come forward and claimed that their suspect’s handwriting matched the Zodiac, and the funny thing is that none of the exemplars from any of the suspects look anything alike. It’s also humorous to me that specific people who have made the claim that their suspect was the Zodiac killer (knowingly that their suspect’s handwriting does not match the Zodiac letters) and that their suspect ‘can’t be ruled out on handwriting alone’, choose to dismiss my father over handwriting? If the Rev. Fliger in fact filled out the marriage certificate for my father and my mother, his handwriting looks very much like some of the Zodiac writing. However, there are other exemplars from my father that were compared to specifically excluding the marriage certificate that Mike Wakshull independently validated that he is completely remaining ‘virtually certain’ that my father authored the Zodiac letters.

What is this about? Anyone ever seen this?

Mike

Hi-

I just read something from 2015 where Stewart was whining about how right after his book came out some vicious Zodiac researchers trashed his handwriting evidence but that what we did not know is that there is more handwriting in his possession from EVB that also matches Z’s. If so, why did Wakshull call me in August 2014 and say that he was wrong about the handwriting? Did Stewart keep this other writing from his expert for some reason?

He also whined about the fact that we are ignoring the fingerprint evidence. That is because it is also bogus. There is never any reason to make a mirror image of a fingerprint in order to make it match. The only reason you make a mirror image copy is if the print does not match any other way!

"That is when I went back to that box of evidence and began searching through every piece of paper I had, and stumbled upon 5 exemplars, one being the now ‘infamous’ marriage certificate between my mother and my father. I knew by looking at every one of those exemplars that my father’s handwriting looked exactly like the handwriting in the Zodiac letters, but I am not trained in that field. My co-author took information to Michael Wakshull, who came to his conclusion…based on each of those exemplars he was given, not the marriage certificate alone, but the entirety. The most important thing about the Zodiac case is it will never be solved based upon handwriting. Period. So many people have come forward and claimed that their suspect’s handwriting matched the Zodiac, and the funny thing is that none of the exemplars from any of the suspects look anything alike. It’s also humorous to me that specific people who have made the claim that their suspect was the Zodiac killer (knowingly that their suspect’s handwriting does not match the Zodiac letters) and that their suspect ‘can’t be ruled out on handwriting alone’, choose to dismiss my father over handwriting? If the Rev. Fliger in fact filled out the marriage certificate for my father and my mother, his handwriting looks very much like some of the Zodiac writing. However, there are other exemplars from my father that were compared to specifically excluding the marriage certificate that Mike Wakshull independently validated that he is completely remaining ‘virtually certain’ that my father authored the Zodiac letters.

What is this about? Anyone ever seen this?

Mike

How could we ever know whether it was truly his father’s writings, or a local priest’s? I think his 15 minutes is about up, thank God! He also has never addressed the fact that his biological mother reached out to me disputing much of what was in his book. Sometimes, the truth is an inconvenient thing

Here is the problem however, type "zodiac killer" into google, and you get a photo of Earl Van Best.

Here is the problem however, type "zodiac killer" into google, and you get a photo of Earl Van Best.

…and Ted Cruz. Shows you they can’t be taken seriously.

Hi-

Whenever I search Google on Zodiac, I always write -cruz, -stewart, -van best. Maybe some of you write -rodelli, which is fine, too. ))

Mike