Ok then,

Can we refrain from naming and talking about people in your posts, thank you. If the post comes back with people’s names in it I WILL edit it.

We are typing online here not writing a college theses. I never said I was in Mensa you asked me and therefore you were right in your initial assumption ( see above )that I was referring to others. I only hope to break even on publishing cost’s in regard to my book and it will be free to read online for everyone so your little theory about me going all Tom Voigt ( profit from murder ) is incorrect however amusing it may be . I think I’m smarter than everyone else because I’m in Mensa? I pay a monthly fee to get a newsletter and a pin and that my friend makes me stupid.

CM

CM – You stated that Gareth Penn’s father worked for the SFPD. That is incorrect. He worked for the California Dept of Justice.

We are typing online here not writing a college theses.

A college what? Sorry..couldn’t resist.

We are typing online here not writing a college theses.

A college what? Sorry..couldn’t resist.

Theses

The plural of these.

Unless he really meant to say thesis.

Perhaps another of his "intentional" errors.

….if you would of asked…

CM

Now I know you aren’t R.G. and might have misunderstood you saying you were also a Mensa member.

CM…I wasn’t accusing you of taking credit for R.G’s work, I was wondering if he took credit for yours. He discussed and posted in regards to Dante’s Inferno on message boards and his site and certainly gave credit to no one else for it.

I am not sure why you are here posting if you aren’t going to share your results. What is the point of it? Are you really writing a book? Will your results be in it? I think I know the answer.

Firstly, no I am not Mr. Grant albeit I am accused of such often I assure you. Yes, I am a member of Mensa as well as my daughter( nothing to brag about really). I never said that I would not share my results, because I will, just not in regards to the 340 until after the 4th month of this year. I am not writing a book it is finished and will be published under 14TEEN this year. Tahoe27 look how I posted my introduction. Being a man of psychology I know for a fact that :

A. Opening my introduction as I did would produce massive viewership in regards to my posts.
B. My incomplete posts would give me an idea of how the general public are looking at this case.
C. All my posts are made so that anyone can find the solution themselves(cryptic).
D. I am looking for people who can do C.

I do hope that addresses your concerns in regard to the above post authored by yourself.

Yours
CipherM

"…after the 4th month of this year." is just a little too open-ended for my tastes.

How about being straight-forward for once…give it a try, you might like it.

So your book is coming out when, exactly? Sometime between May, 2014 and, what, the day after never?

Who’s publishing your book? An actual publishing house? A vanity press? Downloads on Amazon?

Finally, another of your ilk was once concerned with "putting butts in the seats", as it were, just as you’ve stated was your intent…crave attention much?

Sorry, no ciGar…….not even close.

CipherMatrix-

I decided to draw a picture anyway. More for the benefit of the reader. In your very first post in this thread, you said:

Looking at the famous 340 Zodiac cipher/code one thing stands out above all others in that there are simple "dots" within the block matrix placed at "6" intervals. This very strongly hints at this cipher/code being binary in nature as dots are used as place holders in binary math without which would make little sense. These dots are placed as such within the matrix grid :
The first dot counting from the top to the right appears after the (28) symbols. The second appears after the next (86) symbols. The third appears again after the next (86) symbols. The fourth appears after the following (31) symbols. The fifth appears after the next (25) symbols. The final and sixth appears following the next (8) symbols in the graph. Next there are (73) symbols until the end of the graph with no dot place holder.

28 86 86 31 25 8 73

Except that that is wrong. You have made a major mistake in your VERY FIRST STEP. See this image:

There is no second group of 86 symbols. There are groups of 28, 86, 83, 31, 25, 8 and 73.

So everything you did after that incorrect first step is also wrong. The binary is wrong, the morse is wrong, the two "46" are wrong, the whole house of cards falls down.
If anyone here has made a "blunder" I do believe that would be you.

-glurk

I don’t like to double-post, but I had to add this:

I don’t like to double-post, but I had to add this:

Double posting because you cannot figure it out ( see my first reply).

P.S
By the way I have replied to every single one of your attacks, however, you seem to ignore every single question I have asked you. You sated Zodiac did not use mathematics in his work ( see above ). So, if Zodiac never used mathematics how then did he calculate the radian on the Phillips 66 map code?

If anyone here has made a "blunder" I do believe that would be you.

CM… please explain for us stupids. But if you done messed up part 1, doesn’t that mess up the rest of them thar parts too?

CipherMatrix-

I double-posted because I wanted to post that cartoon that I felt was both funny and relevant.

What questions have you asked me that I have not responded to? Post them again, please, I will respond.

Where did I state that Zodiac did not use mathematics? Please quote where I said that, if you can.

-glurk

We are typing online here not writing a college theses.

A college what? Sorry..couldn’t resist.

Theses

The plural of these.

Unless he really meant to say thesis.

Perhaps another of his "intentional" errors.

THESES

T=20 H=8 E=5 S=19 E=5 S=19

20+8+5+19+5+19=76

Number 76
Cryptic way to remind gurk about the fact he failed to answer my question about the radian and the Phillips 66 gas station code. The number 76 is a brand of Conoco Phillips gas stations(76). Its also a 14 ( 4TEEN )- gonal number. Trust me I’m prepared to take the heat here but you guys are missing everything.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/76_(number)

P.S
And I quote AK Wilks "Perhaps another of his "intentional" error" ….. I bet you feel real clever now?

CM

28 86 86 31 25 8 73

These numbers in binary are thus :

00110010001110000011100000110110001110000011011000110011001100010011001000110101001110000011011100110011

In addition to the incorrect 86, I might add that the binary you provided is for the number 2886863125873, not for "28 86 86 31 25 8 73". Either way, the initial assumptions were incorrect.

28 86 86 31 25 8 73

These numbers in binary are thus :

00110010001110000011100000110110001110000011011000110011001100010011001000110101001110000011011100110011

In addition to the incorrect 86, I might add that the binary you provided is for the number 2886863125873, not for "28 86 86 31 25 8 73". Either way, the initial assumptions were incorrect.

Ok for now on I’ll hold your hand and add the place holders. Sorry……

28 86 86 31 25 8 73

These numbers in binary are thus :

00110010001110000011100000110110001110000011011000110011001100010011001000110101001110000011011100110011

In addition to the incorrect 86, I might add that the binary you provided is for the number 2886863125873, not for "28 86 86 31 25 8 73". Either way, the initial assumptions were incorrect.

Ok for now on I’ll hold your hand and add the place holders. Sorry……

Oh, and by the way ….. your binary to text program you are using will not add place holders for you so your going to have to do some homework.