Last seen: September 28, 2026 4:27 pm
Here I am! Before presenting the solution involving the numerical triplets, I will proceed step by step. I will first focus on the left-hand section o…
Maybe some of your thoughts, and this conversation in general, have helped me find something! I can’t say yet whether it’s really the solution to the …
If I apply all possible Caesar shifts to the triplets after converting them using an A=0 system, some interesting combinations begin to emerge and see…
Shift | 1968 | 1974 | 81 Jun | 81 Oct | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 ———————————————…
See, I think this is where things become interesting again. What I would try is converting all the deltas into letters using an A=0 Caesar-type system…
I’ll be honest: I have found, in other anonymous letters as well, some indications of coordinates being used to point to a specific location. So I can…
And what do you think about the possibility that the Monster’s author deliberately constructed some kind of puzzle letter, using geographical coordina…
Since we are on the subject, I should also mention a couple of alternative interpretations of “ME 72 MAY”, even though I personally do not find them p…
According to other researchers who have worked on the case, the photograph of the envelope sent to Silvia Della Monica does not appear to have been pu…
Another small suggestion, this time not my own. In the letter to Paolo Vagheggi there is a drawing of the lines of a palm, used almost like a map: the…
Yes, I agree: taken on its own, this could certainly just be a coincidence, and I wouldn’t give it too much weight at this stage. Still, I find the co…
Bingo! Pretty crazy, right?
Ok! Now you have a clue on the envelope, very much in Zodiac style, with the word “may / maggio” and two numbers that need to interact with each other…
Exactly! But in 1974 Zodiac was claiming 37 victims. The alleged Monster of Florence, on the other hand, seems to indicate 72 already before the 1974 …
Let me give you a little tidbit now, even though it’s not directly related to the analysis you’re doing: what does that “ME 72” remind you of?