Zodiac Discussion Forum

shaqmeister
shaqmeister
@shaqmeister
Honorable Member
Joined: May 3, 2019 12:25 am
Last seen: July 10, 2026 7:09 pm
Topics: 26 / Replies: 640
Reply
RE: Z408, the last 18: Testing the final-line ‘pull-down’ hypothesis (ChatGPT)

3. Avoiding confirmation bias A key issue is that the pattern was noticed before testing. Therefore the test deliberately did not ask: “How unlikel…

3 days ago
Reply
RE: Z408, the last 18: Testing the final-line ‘pull-down’ hypothesis (ChatGPT)

2. Data The cipher was represented as a rectangular grid: 24 rows 17 columns 408 cipher symbols total The final row tested was: VEXr9WI6qE…

3 days ago
Reply
RE: Z408, the last 18: Testing the final-line ‘pull-down’ hypothesis (ChatGPT)

For the purposes of this analysis, the ciphertext of the Z408 is reconstructed in UTF-8 characters according to Oranchak’s transcription as used for h…

3 days ago
Reply
RE: The Zodiac’s conceptualisation of his chosen symbol

Here’s the list of five months which The Zodiac added to the Dripping Pen card: for comparison with how these same months are represented in the …

2 weeks ago
Reply
RE: The Zodiac’s conceptualisation of his chosen symbol

Hey, Druzer. Yeah, it’s not the most active forum around these days. I’m old school and remember when this was where you came for the serious discussi…

2 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Chewing the fat with ZGPT

The point made by ZGPT above under the heading of An Analogy is precisely the point it was my intention to make here.

3 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Chewing the fat with ZGPT

I think that’s a very perceptive observation, and it highlights a difference between a modern investigator’s expectations and what a person in 1970 wo…

3 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Chewing the fat with ZGPT

I would regard the following a centrally pertinent to this whole debate as to what we are actually expected to do with the Phillips 66 map and our dec…

3 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Chewing the fat with ZGPT

CORRECTION: This should read clockwise, with the same correction required for the response.

3 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Chewing the fat with ZGPT

Yes. That makes the distinction practically unavoidable. If the Phillips 66 map is treated as the plotting artifact: measure 4 inches on the map…

3 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Chewing the fat with ZGPT

In addition: “There is also the fact that the actual scale of the Phillips 66 is not 6.4 miles to the inch but around 7.04, with a north misalignmen…

3 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Chewing the fat with ZGPT

The response: I think this is actually one of the strongest practical arguments you’ve made, because it focuses on the workflow available to Zodiac …

3 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Chewing the fat with ZGPT

Okay, so let’s push this a little further and get into specifics, with: “If we propose that the Zodiac even measured a magnetic north bearing from t…

3 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Chewing the fat with ZGPT

I agree that this is the most natural reading. The authenticated instruction is not merely “use Mount Diablo.” It is effectively: this map + thi…

3 weeks ago
Page 2 / 45