Last seen: November 11, 2026 11:12 pm
Adding these just for completeness. IMG_4967.png IMG_4964.png
As a parting gesture in the spirit of “helping,” I would encourage you to spend some considerable time with this post and its explanatory supplement i…
And this is how we identify confirmation bias in our own work. The definitive tests have been done already and the results presented here. They conc…
You’re ok from here on out, dear Lendor. I’m done now. I’m just wasting both our times.
Anyway, there you have it.
It has to be this.
The compositor, under the hypothetical, is though. There has to be some reason why specific changes are sought and this reason has to be directed to t…
Nonsense. This is mere confirmation bias at work.
The compositor is, under the hypothetical, though. Up until this point he hasn’t needed an ‘L’, for any reason.
To follow up on this previous point, you can think about it like this. Where the propagation of errors appear in formulating the astrological purpose,…
The key factor in relation to the “inferred errors,” as you call them—the one which argues against your interpretation of non-determinism here—is that…
And after all of this, dear friends, this is precisely why we must remain daily grateful of the fact that Occam chose absolutely not to keep his disco…
Let’s, then, continue to follow our hypothetical compositor reasoning and search for how we might introduce an L in the RA sequence. Apparently, we …
Well, apparently, we are driven to take the non-common letters here, T, S, Z, O, remove the Z (of course! No confirmation bias here 🤣) and sum…
We need something to direct us, at this point. We cannot simply continue to inflict uncontrolled alterations upon what we have and suppose that we hav…