I find this stupidity to be offensively annoying, as I sit around waiting for four months.

But I know where it comes from.  You are mad because I solved the cipher and you did not.  Deal with it.

And the moment someone talks about natural origin and watering holes, the tiny brains light up and say:  “Yeah!”.  It derails the conversation and is just meant to create doubt in the truth I have shared.  And you keep generate more BS to try to say it is wrong, some of which has been deceptive (your natural origin theory image that you posted).

And so, I just find you disingenuous.  It is only my perspective and I am not right about everything.  I have no proof you are disingenuous, other than my subjective belief, similar to the author of the theory you linked in this thread.

Anyways I have been dealing with Zodiac internet forum people for awhile now and it is not fun and basically hit my limit on all of that.

I come here just as a protest now.  My work is still open to falsification in my thread, I defined explicit criteria that are objective (and I don’t care if you claim otherwise).

And maybe you don’t behave that way with everyone, just with those that present superior solutions to Z32, compared to your own.

Sorry but you missed the mark and I landed correctly.

That is what I had to do to find the triangle, while you just say “cows and mother nature did that” and smirk.  Pseudo-intellectual debunks on Zodiac internet forums, including arguing against the scientific truth test.  I think you should retire from Zodiac internet forums at this point, as I will be doing soon.  I give it a one star review, mostly due to stupid debunk attempts such as your own.  They are disguised as being legitimate inquiries but I keep hearing the same annoying ones, and know that they are not legit and highly implausible.  The only purpose is to create doubt of everything else and spark a debate, which you have done.

Posted by: @coder1987

↑

Lol, you still think the landmark is made by cows.  Cute.  

My posts in this thread, while spammy, are on topic.  The article you linked is a fairy tale invented by a blogger.

@coder1987, I  can assure you that I have absolutely zero thoughts of any kind about your triangle in the grass, who made it or when or anything to do with it whatsoever. This is a thread asking for accounts of ordnance finds possibly relating to the description in the ‘Buss Bomb’ letter, nothing to do with any cipher. I wish to hear nothing more from you about your obsession, especially in my thread here. It is long past the time for you to JUST STOP, and I ask you simply to do that, and right now. We’ve had absolutely enough of this barrage of madness, thank you.

Posted by: @shaqmeister

↑

Posted by: @coder1987

↑

Lol, you still think the landmark is made by cows.  Cute.  

My posts in this thread, while spammy, are on topic.  The article you linked is a fairy tale invented by a blogger.

@coder1987, I  can assure you that I have absolutely zero thoughts of any kind about your triangle in the grass, who made it or when or anything to do with it whatsoever. This is a thread asking for accounts of ordnance finds possibly relating to the description in the ‘Buss Bomb’ letter, nothing to do with any cipher. I wish to hear nothing more from you about your obsession, especially in my thread here. It is long past the time for you to JUST STOP, and I ask you simply to do that, and right now. We’ve had absolutely enough of this barrage of madness, thank you.

 

I won’t be stopping, and you cannot stop me from sharing the physical evidence with others for their consideration.

If the forum admins would like to censor me here as well, they can be my guest.

I had come around super nice at first, then I had to hear annoying theories everywhere.  I wasn’t a part of these forums ect previously.  Only came to share the triangle landmark I found.

Sorry I solved Z32 and you did not.

Posted by: @coder1987

↑

I won’t be stopping, and you cannot stop me from sharing the physical evidence with others for their consideration.

Take it elsewhere. I don’t want to here another thing about it here. Not. One. More. Thing.

So, let’s start this again…

Posted by: @shaqmeister

↑

I [came] across a brief article from June 2011 that also cited “vintage explosives” having been discovered at a rented property in San Francisco, with a little more context added by NBC Bay Area here.

It may be that there are other such explosive finds around the Bay Area since 1970 and, if anyone has any stories or articles of this nature, perhaps you could post something on this thread?

Posted by: @shaqmeister

↑

Posted by: @coder1987

↑

I won’t be stopping, and you cannot stop me from sharing the physical evidence with others for their consideration.

Take it elsewhere. I don’t want to here another thing about it here. Not. One. More. Thing.

That is exactly how I felt about your natural origin theory you presented in my thread, lol.

I am mostly talking exactly about the article you shared here.  

These forums are dormant.  If they weren’t my etiquette would be different.

Zodiac internet forum users have annoyed me, I was not one of them previously.  I am not really one them now.  I won’t be around here much longer as I already raised hell for purpose of seeing if someone would falsify the work.  The more annoying and loud, the more people will want to put it to rest.  But that has been option for four months already, and I am just waiting around.  You probably think you accomplished the slam dunk debunk already, but that is simply your imagination at play.   See my profile picture to see what physical reality looks like.

I am waiting for the amazing landmark I found to be scanned, as it will invalidate the theory in the article you shared.

Elsewhere.