You’ve been getting off on bad debunks for weeks. It is pretty obvious you don’t want that thing scanned, I wonder why that is. Maybe because I could be right? I literally recall you citing the privacy of the cows as a reason not to scan it.
Well, at least I can reassure you about that, as I am certain there is absolutely no way I could add my influence to such a decision.
“This isn’t right! It’s not even wrong!”—Wolfgang Pauli (1900–1958)
Basically the odds of that triangle NOT being designed/constructed by the Zodiac are zero point zero, in my mind. And that has essentially been the perspective since I found it. It is a needle in a haystack, and it has been found.
So you could argue that the code model you offered, being simplified by one step which it is not indicated anywhere in the author’s instructions that we should apply – nor have you supported its inclusion anywhere in your pre-research write-up – that your code supports, in this manner, DMW’s solution, slightly better than it does yours.
And this part?
Bump…
“This isn’t right! It’s not even wrong!”—Wolfgang Pauli (1900–1958)
Why did he do it? Well, since I have to sit around, I will throw random ideas out there:
1. Proof of authorship
2. Functional (holds water when it rains, indicates place to scan)
3. Grandiose (a monument to himself)
4. Assertion of dominance over the territory. Like a caveman marking his spot.
5. Maybe other possible reasons I am not aware of.
Anyways I propose IN THREE AND THREE EIGHTHS RADIANS TEN as the solution to Z32. Shared publicly on December 22, 2025 by David Stampher (that’s me).
The triangle landmark is multi-purpose. It isn’t a watering hole.
When/if they scan the triangle it will be like something out of a Twilight Zone episode. Can’t wait.
And we can talk about how @DMW pointed to the wrong place, and @shaqmeister told him “good job, I like it”.
And we can talk about how @coder1987, the hero of this story, found the Zodiac triangle after 55 years, for free, and shared his code so others may reproduce the results and analyze the method, which is really the Zodiac’s own method turned into code. He even picks the solution with his crime scenes.
When the hero @coder1987 dropped the payload, it was all written off for reasons such as:
1. “Not a CSP” -Reddit PhD
2. “Zodiac can’t make that triangle, it is too big”. -Smart person, that assumes depth from the image (needs scan)
3. “Cow watering hole” -Stupid person
4. “Natural origin” -The same stupid person.
And that is about it so far. Yawn.
When/if this is verified I will feel good about my contribution and move to greener pastures.
I hear there’s some good wintering pasture over near Lake Herman Road, under the water tanks there. Gets a little parched in summer, though. Even the watering hole dries up.
(Jeez, sometimes you just walk into ’em. 😆 )
“This isn’t right! It’s not even wrong!”—Wolfgang Pauli (1900–1958)
When/if this is verified I will feel good about my contribution and move to greener pastures.
I hear there’s some good wintering pasture over near Lake Herman Road, under the water tanks there. Gets a little parched in summer, though. Even the watering hole dries up.
(Jeez, sometimes you just walk into ’em. 😆 )
Zodiac can see the Blue Rock Springs attack site from the 609ft hill right by the triangle, where the water tanks are now. Already checked that spot out, excellent vantage point with 360 degree view.
I wonder if he ever hung out by LHR.
That 609ft hill is almost like a mini version of Mt. Diablo, and he was king of that hill, in his mind. He marked his spot, duh.
The forum people have been truly hilarious on this one. Just take another look at my profile picture.
From the hill by the triangle, he can look out on the city of Vallejo. Multiple escape routes in all directions. Excellent hill coverage for evasion, sneaking, and recon. You will need to open your eyes to see that.
This specific area has strategic value, due to the landscape, which he was very familiar with. Also happens to be where most of the digging happens in the city, and where my proposed solution lands as well.
I believe Zodiac had mentioned something about a buried object, maybe I am wrong about that as well.
When the hero @coder1987 dropped the payload, it was all written off for reasons such as:
1. “Not a CSP” -Reddit PhD
2. “Zodiac can’t make that triangle, it is too big”. -Smart person, that assumes depth from the image (needs scan)
3. “Cow watering hole” -Stupid person
4. “Natural origin” -The same stupid person.
And that is about it so far. Yawn.
Of course, there was also this, which introduced the objection that the proposed site does not match the details of that as drawn and described by The Zodiac; oh, and this, just to add clarification as you seemed not to understand ‘falsification’, with more detail to follow. The cow watering hole analysis came next, starting here (you were already getting angry by this point). This thread went off into histrionics after that, but on another thread we did get into the specific errors of thinking that some method of conversion to lat./long. coordinates can allow Google Maps to model the same locations as selected on the Phillips Map, but more accurately in some way, rather than taking us to some completely different place entirely. The specifics of the introduced errors between the two mappings was then analysed in detail here, and then off into its own thread. We were then faced again with the errors of not addressing the specifics of what we are asked to look for, and thus that thread ended.
But, yeah. Focus on just the cow-hole objections, as if we’re good on everything else.
“This isn’t right! It’s not even wrong!”—Wolfgang Pauli (1900–1958)
When the hero @coder1987 dropped the payload, it was all written off for reasons such as:
1. “Not a CSP” -Reddit PhD
2. “Zodiac can’t make that triangle, it is too big”. -Smart person, that assumes depth from the image (needs scan)
3. “Cow watering hole” -Stupid person
4. “Natural origin” -The same stupid person.
And that is about it so far. Yawn.
Of course, there was also this, which introduced the objection that the proposed site does not match the details of that as drawn and described by The Zodiac; oh, and this, just to add clarification as you seemed not to understand ‘falsification’, with more detail to follow. The cow watering hole analysis came next, starting here (you were already getting angry by this point). This thread went off into histrionics after that, but on another thread we did get into the specific errors of thinking that some method of conversion to lat./long. coordinates can allow Google Maps to model the same locations as selected on the Phillips Map, but more accurately in some way, rather than taking us to some completely different place entirely. The specifics of the introduced errors between the two mappings was then analysed in detail here, and then off into its own thread. We were then faced again with the errors of not addressing the specifics of what we are asked to look for, and thus that thread ended.
But, yeah. Focus on just the cow-hole objections, as if we’re good on everything else.
I guess what you are missing is we diverged when you argued that the cows privacy is a good reason not to perform the scientific test I’ve been talking about.
Anyways you tried and failed to debunk. Haversine works. Sorry.
None of your angles are what I’ve heard from what I assume to be more qualified individuals than yourself. This isn’t the first place I’ve had to crawl to. The few that did get back to me were invaluable, because without them I would still think there was a logic or projection error. Never happened. I know that enough qualified people have seen it by now and literally none of what you have tried has popped up elsewhere.
There is a big difference between what I see on forums and what I hear privately. But I am still waiting for the verification test.
