TODAY Extra chat to author and former cold case detective John Cameron about his new book, ‘It’s Me, Edward Wayne Edwards, The Serial Killer You’ve Never Heard Of’.
The latest in a long history of bogus claims about the identity of the Zodiac Killer. The Australian morning television show "Today" featured an interview with John Cameron about his claims. As usual, the reporters don’t make the slightest effort to verify any of his claims, which is how Gary Stewart (author of "The Most Dangerous Animal of All") was able to get so much attention for his similarly bogus "identification" of the Zodiac Killer.
Here’s the clip: (Click image below to watch on Youtube fullsize or watch smaller embedded clip)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKwYvAGXiiI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKwYvAGXiiI
Thanks trav!
The headline in the still clip: "The World’s Worst Murderer".
Sounds like if he pulled all that off he would be the best murderer ever. EVER…ever….ever.
It’s beyond ridiculous and just goes to show guys like Cameron can experience borderline psychosis. After years of studying people like this and their m/o…they all start to look similar. Must be the same guy!
It’s amazing to me. And everyone just has to be constantly exposed to this b.s. because the media would rather have the ratings than go through the effort of fact checking, which would result in having to throw away a "good" story.
That is the statement of the year.
Scary that Cameron was a Detective. How can he really believe this crap? Also, the media does not care about the truth, they just want to get the attention from the word ‘Zodiac’ case in point, the Earl Van Best movie.
There is more than one way to lose your life to a killer
http://www.zodiackillersite.com/
http://zodiackillersite.blogspot.com/
https://twitter.com/Morf13ZKS
His story hit this New Zealand paper too:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/ar … d=11668242
The Zodiac case was already solved by Robert Graysmith 30 years ago. It says so on his dust jacket.
The reporters don’t need to check the validity of the "evidence", they should know that it’s not "news" to report something that has already been reported. How can the Zodiac case be solved again if it was already solved fifteen times before? Or should I say Times 17.